ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: aaaaaaaa
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og198,og200-两道than 补充句子的题目

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-10-5 06:14:00 | 只看该作者

携隐版主,能否解释一下OG199中,这题好像符合你的条件,但是没有省略will. 题目如下:

Because the Earth's crust is more solid there and thus better able to transmit shock waves, an earthquake of a given magnitude typically devastates an area 100 times greater in the eastern United States than it does in the West.
(A) of a given magnitude typically devastates an area 100 times greater in the eastern United States than it does in the West
(B) of a given magnitude will typically devastate 100 times the area if it occurs in the eastern United States instead of the West
(C) will typically devastate 100 times the area in the eastern United States than one of comparable magnitude occurring in the West

(D) in the eastern United States
        
will
        
typically devastate an area 100 times greater than will a quake of comparable magnitude occurring in the West(D)
(E) that occurs in the eastern United States will typically devastate 100 times more area than if it occurred with comparable magnitude in the West

又在别的贴子里看到一题,这一题我是明白的,主句使用助动词will,从句助动词与主句一致,从句省略动词只保留助动词。

又看了一下上面的题目,

than usual是比较时间状语,than was ever before也是比较时间状语,唉,还是没想通。

等NN解答。

22#
发表于 2006-10-5 16:28:00 | 只看该作者
助动词是否补出,在于会不会引起歧义,如果句子不可能产生歧义,根据简洁原则最好省略,如果会引起歧义就必须留着不能省。这个是宗旨,抱歉没有时间根据题目具体分析,MM应该能理解吧。
23#
发表于 2006-10-6 13:10:00 | 只看该作者

carolhide斑斑,谢谢你。

我现在你说的这个理论我是会的,但是就是这两道题放在一起的时候我分不清楚了,还是希望有能帮分析一下这两道题,因为这两题太典型了,而我现在觉得这两题都省略了WAS也没有什么不同啊,我知道我这样想肯定是错的,但是错在哪里我不知道。。。。

请大家再帮我看看吧。。

24#
发表于 2006-10-21 03:29:00 | 只看该作者

30题不能去掉was, because of the different tense.----"has been ..." and "was"

25#
发表于 2007-4-26 17:36:00 | 只看该作者

继续OG198关于省略的讨论:

ETS的意思是:A选项可以改成 Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) it had had for its previous campaigns...这里的had  had并不是had had entered(怎么可能两次入侵俄国呢),而是指在entered Russia之前的任何一次战役中所拥有的粮草供给(it had had supplies)

E选项则可以还原成Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any  its previous campaigns...

我觉得A和E两个选项的省略还原都可以接受,不存在谁对谁错的问题。但E更简介。

26#
发表于 2007-8-12 14:18:00 | 只看该作者

完全同意我爱人民币的。

27#
发表于 2007-9-2 02:10:00 | 只看该作者
我爱人民币是对的
28#
发表于 2007-12-5 00:31:00 | 只看该作者

XDF说像any这样的强烈语气词,是不能增减的,这里原文中并没有,正确选项中却加上了.晕

29#
发表于 2009-5-7 19:22:00 | 只看该作者
我也爱人民币
30#
发表于 2010-2-17 17:58:06 | 只看该作者
继续OG198关于省略的讨论:
ETS的意思是:A选项可以改成 Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) it had had for its previous campaigns...这里的had  had并不是had had entered(怎么可能两次入侵俄国呢),而是指在entered Russia之前的任何一次战役中所拥有的粮草供给(it had had supplies)
E选项则可以还原成Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any  its previous campaigns...
我觉得A和E两个选项的省略还原都可以接受,不存在谁对谁错的问题。但E更简介。
-- by 会员 我爱人民币 (2007/4/26 17:36:00)

A 选项少了一个had 哦they也不对哦
Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) it had had for its previous campaigns...这里的had  had并不是had had entered(怎么可能两次入侵俄国呢),而是指在entered Russia之前的任何一次战役中所拥有的粮草供给(it had had supplies)
赞同这样还原
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 17:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部