ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 麻集爱
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 8 35

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-1-7 14:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用bettyamen在2004-12-10 8:28:00的发言:



Q36。 Which of the following is most clearly an example of the policy advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in line 26




  1. A government provides training to women who wish to move out of occupations in which women are concertrated.


  2. A government supports research that analyzes the connection between wage inequality and poverty among single parent families headed by women.


  3. A government surveys wages annually to make certain that women and men in the same jobs receive the same pay.


  4. A government analyzes jobs in term of the education and responsibility they require and publishes a list of jobs that should be considered equivalent for wage purposes.


   E.A government provides large rent subsidies to single parents whose wages are less than half the average worker’s wage.


这题为什么是答案E,从文中又是怎样推 出的。我想了很久啦



我选D.


这T问以下那个是26行中提到的那个POLICY的例子. 那个POLICY就是COMPARABLE WORTH STANDARD. 也就是相同技术含量相同报酬啊. 那不就是D吗?


怎么会是E呢?

12#
发表于 2005-1-17 00:27:00 | 只看该作者

TO:漆潇潇

题目问的是:Q36。 Which of the following is most clearly an example of the policy advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in line 26
这里的
policy是advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in line 26,就是analysts提倡的政策。

文中提到三类人的观点:

Some economists 提倡加强执法,同工同酬

other economists 提倡立新法,同价值同酬

analysts 提倡政府补贴

13#
发表于 2005-2-12 00:00:00 | 只看该作者

Jerryyang的分析好透彻,看了之后一下子就清楚了,谢谢!

14#
发表于 2005-3-8 11:44:00 | 只看该作者
Aaaa.....
15#
发表于 2005-4-11 21:26:00 | 只看该作者

我能问个巨弱智的问题吗,大家千万别笑我

But some policy analysts assert that, although comparable worth would virtually equalize male and female wages, because many men earn wages that are below the poverty line.

这句话many single-parent families headed by women would remain in poverty 和男人的工资在贫穷线下有什么关系啊?

16#
发表于 2005-4-12 11:27:00 | 只看该作者

But some policy analysts assert that, although comparable worth would virtually equalize male and female wages, because many men earn wages that are below the poverty line.

这句话many single-parent families headed by women would remain in poverty 和男人的工资在贫穷线下有什么关系啊?

尽管男女同工同酬了,但是因为很多男人的薪水就在贫困线以下,所以很多单亲妈妈的收入也在贫困线以下(因为新水一样嘛!)可以认为是逻辑上的前提和结论的关系。

open to discuss.

17#
发表于 2005-4-12 11:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用questionmark在2005-4-11 21:26:00的发言:

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-30 11:02:00编辑过]
18#
发表于 2005-4-30 07:36:00 | 只看该作者

37题的答案是啥啊, 当下来的资料说是A, 对否

19#
发表于 2005-4-30 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
I vote for the choice A.
20#
发表于 2005-5-5 12:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用醋醋妹妹在2004-6-17 2:30:00的发言:

1. 偶选B. 排除法.


based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income. 这个appropriate让我感觉选B舒服的多. 偶建议把问题和选项B连起来读两遍.



2. C中的under revision有问题. 文章中并未提到要修改这个有关补助的方案.


题目:文章暗示美国政府对于提供给低收入家庭工资补助的政策是什么?

B:基于家庭收入的适当来源的假设


怎么我还是没读懂B选项为什么对?它和文章哪里对应起来了? 傻了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-16 22:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部