ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3388|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助!!!一道 很纠结的题目!!!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-26 20:12:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Gortland  has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore. since per capita income continue to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) the total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially.
B) the population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's year of growing properity.
C) the per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels.
D) in Gortland. neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls.
E) people in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of  grain.
有哪位G友能解释下这道题的?答案选E,主要是不明白Per capita 是什么意思? 而且为什么选E?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-26 20:16:34 | 只看该作者
Gortland  has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore. since per capita income continue to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) the total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially.
B) the population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's year of growing properity.
C) the per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels.
D) in Gortland. neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls.
E) people in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of  grain.
有哪位G友能解释下这道题的?答案选E,主要是不明白Per capita 是什么意思? 而且为什么选E?
-- by 会员 jameshzd (2011/5/26 20:12:20)

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-26 20:21:08 | 只看该作者
请看二楼的题目,一楼的题目我打掉了一个 income,欢迎G友能来讨论下啊!
地板
发表于 2011-5-27 00:34:25 | 只看该作者
per capita: per person.

The conclusion of the argument says that since the average income and comsumption of meat has risen while the domestic grain production stays flat, G will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate E, you get:
people in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will radically decrease their consumption of grain.
If this is true, then the total consumption of grain might decrease dramatically in G if those who eat more meat would eat far less grain. Therefore, the might not be any need to import either grain or meat or both. Thus, the argument falls apart if you negate E.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-27 08:20:19 | 只看该作者
thanks! the phrase"not radically decrease" is always difficult for us to catch its meaning at first glance, the method of negation will be better!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部