- UID
- 283857
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-10-15
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
大作文两篇 请各位牛人指点!!
Do you agree or notwith following statement: most people solve their important problems bythemselves or with the help from their families; the help from government isnot necessary.
It isa highly controversial topic that people should help themselves, or turn toothers help, such as family, or government. As for me, the answer depends onthe situation. First of all, people must solve the personal requirement by themselves.In general, one has a responsibility to care himself. For example, I want to studyabroad. Although my family and friends support me to pursue the dream, I mustarrange my schedule between study and job and to study hard for Toefl and GMATexam. In this case, I cannot accomplish this task without the help by myself. Further,sometimes, it is an efficient method to ask family or friends help. Most oftime, to do everything by self is a waste of time. For example, I need money tostudy abroad. If I want to study oversea after I save such huge amount money, Iwill need at least 5 more years to gather it. Yet, with the aid by my parents,I can reach this goal right now. In fact, people tend to help each others. However, the significant issue, such as, the unemployment, welfare, orinternational issue must be supported by government. For instance, the highjoblessness rate is a desperate problem in many countries. If you are thatjobless person, you need the help from government. As we know, this kind ofsituation is not a single case. The crucial factor of that may be industrialadjust or economic environment change. In a nutshell, there is no universal answer of who should help one. Itdepends on the condition. The most important is that you must evaluate themethod by yourself.
Do you agree or disagree the followingstatement? Movies and televisions should always show audience good people arebeing rewarded and bad people are being punished.
It is a controversial issue when it comes to weather the TV programs ormovies should always conclude the moral contents. Some people think that thepublic media should always put the story that good people will have a betterresult. Some other people think that media should discover both of thecondition. From my point of view, I tend to second one. I disagree thestatement.
First of all, it is unreasonable we can see only good or positive storyon TV. Although some story seems that the good person has no reward or betterresult, there is something we can learn from it. For example, a person didgreat effort on his job, but he ended up with losing his job. In a glance, wefeel unfair for the man. However, if you see it deeply, you can know that theman got fired due to his honest. He was reluctant to do something illegal. Asfor an audience, if I were the man, I might choose the same. On the other hand, if there is a misbehavior on the TV program, I canalso learn a lesson from that. In our daily life, we cannot choose our life. Inother words, I possibility meet some bad guy, and I cannot reject somethinghappened in my life. However, though the movies or TV shows, I realize varioussituation there will occur. This is a beneficial for me, and more importantly,I can exemplify the case to my child. In a nutshell, mass media is where people get the information. Althoughpositive content is good to play on TV, but it is unsuited that some informationrevealed some parts of real. |
|