Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
A.Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated
B.Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
C.Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating
D.Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated E.Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating 答案B c选项PREP上说原本的主句被改成了修饰成分,句子重心改变；stimulating逻辑主语成了tiny islets错误；由于前面是主系表结构，所以stimulating不做伴随结果状语，割裂前后因果关系；under provisions of the new maritime code错误修饰sea areas 是不是V+ing前面为主系表结构就不能表伴随作状语 只能修饰主语？？？
原本的主句被改成了修饰成分,句子重心改变；stimulating逻辑主语成了tiny islets错误；由于前面是主系表结构，所以stimulating不做伴随结果状语，割裂前后因果关系；under provisions of the new maritime code错误修饰sea areas 是不是V+ing前面为主系表结构就不能表伴随作状语 只能修饰主语？？？
good question! doing跟在主系表结构后面可以修饰整个结构，但是也有其特殊之处，比如不坐伴随结果状语。 因为是主系表结构，所以主句描述的并不是一个动作，而是一个状态。对于一个状态，我们没有结果可言，所以就不存在做伴随结果状语了。而如果是伴随状态，则stimulating的主语是islets，逻辑不符合。
good question! doing跟在主系表结构后面可以修饰整个结构，但是也有其特殊之处，比如不坐伴随结果状语。 因为是主系表结构，所以主句描述的并不是一个动作，而是一个状态。对于一个状态，我们没有结果可言，所以就不存在做伴随结果状语了。而如果是伴随状态，则stimulating的主语是islets，逻辑不符合。
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/5/8 16:41:42)
感谢版主大人现身！今天又看到一题相关的 PREP2-210 Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
答案E 虽然我做对了 E的句子逻辑意思表达的比较好。 PREP上的解释 A. 本选项语法上没有错误，但是逻辑上不正确：outnumbering做结果状语，而outnumbering和前面的were written并没有直接因果关系，were written和outnumber是两件完全独立、不相关的事情，所以彼此之间不应该有修饰关系
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-5-8 11:19:49
收藏
收藏
发表于 2011-5-8 16:41:42
楼主
