GWD 7-Q41 不明白阿不明白

灭绝湿太

Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher's response?
A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes


题干大意是不是这样“我们的杂志没有自由主义偏见。第一次审查，因为有保守主义倾向所以没有出版。第二次审查有了自由主义所以出版了。杂志的行为是为了综合的呈现多种观点。”？？？？？
如果是的话，为毛选C啊？？
俺不懂，望给位TX给俺指点指点！~~现在这里谢谢了！

灭绝湿太

看到一种说法是这么解释的。。。。。看来关键是我阅读不过关。。。。选项都没有看懂

=============================

我们的杂志没有自由主义倾向。当我们去年收到一篇关于过于保守的文章，我们先不登它，等今年出现另外一种意见，因此证明我们没有自由主义倾向。问评价？C选项说如果先收到是有自由主义的文章呢？如果登了，说明有倾向；如果没登，等保守的来了才登，就说明没倾向