- UID
- 577897
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-10-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
旧题新问:which/it可以指代宾语或宾语补足语吗?
71. Unlike the original National Museum of Science and Technology in Italy, where the models are encased in glass or operated only by staff members, the Virtual Leonardo Project, an online version of the museum,encourages visitors to "touch" each exhibit, which thereby activates the animated functions of the piece.
(A) exhibit, which thereby activates (B) exhibit, in turn an activation of (C) exhibit, and it will activate (D) exhibit and thereby activate (E) exhibit which, as a result, activates 答案选D现在好像比较能理解了。 encourages visitors to "touch" each exhibit and thereby(to) activate thereby之后应该是to activate与前面的to "touch"平行,这里to被省略了,但是因为thereby,所以前后应该有承接的作用,即通过鼓励游客touch exhibit,同时游客的这个动作可以activate the animated functions of the piece.关于B项,觉得它有造成fragment的倾向~这个状语貌似是凭空出现的,也不知道修饰的是谁,按照逻辑来说应该是...is an activation,或者是像OG所说,an activation以一个名词的形式出现貌似是想要引起一个新的句子,但是这里除了这个名词以外就没别的了……个人一点浅薄的看法,请指正~ 另外我的问题是,发现OG中对ACD的解释分别如下: Th e relative pronoun which requires an antecedent, and there is none provided in this sentence. A Which has no antecedent in the sentence, so it is unclear what activated the display. C Th ere is no antecedent for it because touch is a verb. E Which has no antecedent in this sentence. 看到AE中的which的第一感觉是指代exhibit,但按OG的解释来说可不可以理解为关系代词不能指代宾语或宾语补足语?因为exhibit在句中作touch的宾语?而C中的It不知道是不是有人称代词(it/they等)指代主句主语而不指代宾语的说法?但是OG对C项的解释为什么感觉默认了it应该指代touch?换言之如果touch不是动词it可以指代宾语?而且根据就近原则的话,it不是应该指代exhibit么?
问题有点多,请各位不吝赐教!Thx~ |
|