ChaseDream
搜索
1234567
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: kevin_ws
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-31

[复制链接]
61#
发表于 2011-5-26 09:40:21 | 只看该作者

旧题新问:which/it可以指代宾语或宾语补足语吗?

71. Unlike the original National Museum of Science and Technology in Italy, where the models are encased in glass or operated only by staff members, the Virtual Leonardo Project, an online version of the museum,encourages visitors to "touch" each exhibit, which thereby activates the animated functions of the piece.

(A) exhibit, which thereby activates
(B) exhibit, in turn an activation of
(C) exhibit, and it will activate
(D) exhibit and thereby activate
(E) exhibit which, as a result, activates
答案选D现在好像比较能理解了。
encourages visitors to "touch" each  exhibit and thereby(to) activate
thereby之后应该是to activate与前面的to "touch"平行,这里to被省略了,但是因为thereby,所以前后应该有承接的作用,即通过鼓励游客touch exhibit,同时游客的这个动作可以activate the animated functions of the piece.关于B项,觉得它有造成fragment的倾向~这个状语貌似是凭空出现的,也不知道修饰的是谁,按照逻辑来说应该是...is an activation,或者是像OG所说,an activation以一个名词的形式出现貌似是想要引起一个新的句子,但是这里除了这个名词以外就没别的了……个人一点浅薄的看法,请指正~
另外我的问题是,发现OG中对ACD的解释分别如下:
Th e relative pronoun which requires an
antecedent, and there is none provided in this
sentence.
A Which has no antecedent in the sentence, so
it is unclear what activated the display.
C Th ere is no antecedent for it because touch is
a verb.
E Which has no antecedent in this sentence.
看到AE中的which的第一感觉是指代exhibit,但按OG的解释来说可不可以理解为关系代词不能指代宾语或宾语补足语?因为exhibit在句中作touch的宾语?而C中的It不知道是不是有人称代词(it/they等)指代主句主语而不指代宾语的说法?但是OG对C项的解释为什么感觉默认了it应该指代touch?换言之如果touch不是动词it可以指代宾语?而且根据就近原则的话,it不是应该指代exhibit么?

问题有点多,请各位不吝赐教!Thx~
62#
发表于 2011-5-26 23:33:12 | 只看该作者
顶一个~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 08:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部