ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1778|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全 求解呀~~~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-28 18:25:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Consumers in California seekingpersonal loans have fewer banks to turn to than do consumers elsewhere in the United States.This shortage of competition among banks explains why interest rateson personal loans in California are higher than in any other region of theUnited States.  原文为比较,削弱是也为比较。that supplies an alternate explanation for the existence ofhigher interest rates.现在解释应为他因削弱。
Which of the following, if true, mostsubstantially weakens the conclusion above?
(A) Because of the comparativelyhigh wages they must pay to attract qualified workers, California banks charge depositors more than banks elsewhere do for manyof the services they offer.
(B) Personal loans are riskier than other types of loans,such as home mortgage loans, that banks make.
(C) Since bankdeposits in California are covered by the same type of insurance thatguarantees bank deposits in other parts of the United States, they are no lesssecure than deposits elsewhere.
(D) Theproportion of consumers who default on their personal loans is lower in California than in any other region of the United States.A
(E)Interest rates paid by California banks todepositors are lower than those paid by banks in other parts of the United States because in California there is less competition toattract depositors.


A为什么对我懂,就是不明白为什么B不可以作为他因削弱呀???求NN解释解释~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-29 08:12:29 | 只看该作者
哪位知道的帮忙解答一下~~~
板凳
发表于 2011-4-29 17:16:57 | 只看该作者
B 只是说personal loans比其他形式的LOANS要更高风险,但是riskier doesn't necessarily makes the interest rate higher.
Moreover, B也没有涉及到加州和其他洲的比较。所以B不是他因削弱
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-30 08:53:52 | 只看该作者
十分感谢~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 22:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部