请教大全-10-20两个选项的区别

zcx

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.

(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.

(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.

(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.（D）

(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.

请教，a选项是怎样weaken原文的？偶怎么觉得像个无关选项？欧洲人比美国人更有可能系安全带 与 结论美国应该实行安全带规则 没有关系呀？

d选项是否support?

唐三彩

是因为系安全带才导致伤害小，所以不是因为安全带的不可靠引起伤害大。。

这是一个明显的给出他因weaken。。。。

此外，D好像是无关选项，因为伤害程度和是否撞车机率高并没有关系。。。。

zcx

以下是引用唐三彩在2004-6-7 0:35:00的发言：

是因为系安全带才导致伤害小，所以不是因为安全带的不可靠引起伤害大。。

这是一个明显的给出他因weaken。。。。

此外，D好像是无关选项，因为伤害程度和是否撞车机率高并没有关系。。。。

撞车机率高就有可能造成更多的伤害，所以安全带重要性就重要了。。。

weiyu

1. MM, the point discussed in the argument is the level to the injury, not the number of injury?

To be discussed....

唐三彩

hehe, 94, 楼主你何时考？我7月底考试哦，正想找人互相监督，我在上海

zcx

weiyu gg你总是一针见血，谢谢！

唐三彩，欧这个月就战了，月底吧，不过偶在多伦多哦。

rac111

欧洲的安全带比美国的好(a)-->美乘客伤的比欧洲客重(b)-->美应该制定更严格的安全带标准(c)

选项ABC都间接消弱原因a，

E直接否定了a,因为安全带一样好

用POE法只能选D

zxppx

zcx 发表于 2004-6-7 09:11
以下是引用唐三彩在2004-6-7 0:35:00的发言：是因为系安全带才导致伤害小，所以不是因为安全带的不可靠引起 ...

20.   In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
说明事故的发生跟安全带无关，不知道安全带到底是好，还是不好！无关（D）
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
说明安全带并没有起到作用，削弱