- UID
- 579779
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Reading comprehension.
There are two voices here: that of ME and that of AE. ME: Advertisers want favorable mention in ARTICLES. No way. To be an effective advertising vehicle, we need loyal readership, which would be lost if we give advertiser favorable mention in ARTICLES.
AE: ME is wrong. Readers can tell the difference between articles and advertisement.
So AE missed the ARTICLE part in the discussion. Thus his counter-argument is not effective since he did not refute ME's argument based on mentioning advertisers in ARTICLES.
For the assumption question, just use negation method.
If you negate C, then ME's argument will falls apart. So C is a necessary assumption. B, on the other hand, is too restrictive to be a necessary assumption. |
|