ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3839|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD17-Q24 论坛里没搜到答案……

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-19 19:47:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD17-Q24 to Q27:

In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States.The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives. Labor activistscountered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs.

1938年, labor activists支持政府医疗保障

The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy.AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws.Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers.

. 1935年之前AFL的主要观点,反对政府医疗保障

Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions:the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers.AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power.The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers.That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable.

Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions.Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures.This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation.

AFL最终倒戈支持政府医疗保证.



我想问这个题
The passage suggests which of the following about the voluntarist view held by leaders of the AFL regarding health care?


问题:文章暗示下面的那一个时AFL的领导提倡的V的看法针对健康保险的?(大概翻译)
A.It was opposed by the AALL.

B.It was shared by most unionists until 1935.

C.It antagonized the American Medical Association.

D.It maintained that employer-sponsored health care was preferable to union-run health programs.

E.It was based on the premise that the government should protect child laborers but not adult workers.

健康保险被AALL反对?????不是AALL提出的么    




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-20 09:46:24 | 只看该作者
GWD17-Q24 to Q27:

In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States.The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives. Labor activistscountered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs.

1938年, labor activists支持政府医疗保障

The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy.AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws.Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers.

. 1935年之前AFL的主要观点,反对政府医疗保障

Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions:the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers.AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power.The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers.That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable.

Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions.Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures.This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation.

AFL最终倒戈支持政府医疗保证.



我想问这个题
The passage suggests which of the following about the voluntarist view held by leaders of the AFL regarding health care?


问题:文章暗示下面的那一个时AFL的领导提倡的V的看法针对健康保险的?(大概翻译)
A.It was opposed by the AALL.

B.It was shared by most unionists until 1935.

C.It antagonized the American Medical Association.

D.It maintained that employer-sponsored health care was preferable to union-run health programs.

E.It was based on the premise that the government should protect child laborers but not adult workers.

健康保险被AALL反对?????不是AALL提出的么    




-- by 会员 小唯唯 (2011/4/19 19:47:43)


选A
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-20 20:51:43 | 只看该作者
GWD17-Q24 to Q27:

In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States.The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives. Labor activistscountered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs.

1938年, labor activists支持政府医疗保障

The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy.AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws.Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers.

. 1935年之前AFL的主要观点,反对政府医疗保障

Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions:the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers.AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power.The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers.That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable.

Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions.Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures.This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation.

AFL最终倒戈支持政府医疗保证.



我想问这个题
The passage suggests which of the following about the voluntarist view held by leaders of the AFL regarding health care?


问题:文章暗示下面的那一个时AFL的领导提倡的V的看法针对健康保险的?(大概翻译)
A.It was opposed by the AALL.

B.It was shared by most unionists until 1935.

C.It antagonized the American Medical Association.

D.It maintained that employer-sponsored health care was preferable to union-run health programs.

E.It was based on the premise that the government should protect child laborers but not adult workers.

健康保险被AALL反对?????不是AALL提出的么    




-- by 会员 小唯唯 (2011/4/19 19:47:43)



选A
-- by 会员 xiangmingliu08 (2011/4/20 9:46:24)



是的……我就是不明白为什么选A啊……
地板
发表于 2011-4-20 23:09:08 | 只看该作者
那个AALL不是支持national health insurance么,所以AFL和他们的意见是不同的啊
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-21 09:34:27 | 只看该作者
那个AALL不是支持national health insurance么,所以AFL和他们的意见是不同的啊
-- by 会员 joananna (2011/4/20 23:09:08)



噢噢噢噢!!懂了,是说AFL所持的,对健康保险的看法,是被AALL所反对的!?……我以为“AALL所反对的”是用来修饰保险的……哎哎^谢啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-22 09:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部