og 10 CR 31 （懂了）谢谢大家

naoyixue

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that
conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were
put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the
government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against
the suggestion above?
A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks
might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve
conservation objectives.
C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to
seek contributions from major donors and general public.
D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park
areas.
E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best
efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by
insufficient resources.
问下，a的具体意思， 为啥最终take therir leader=国家企业， 谢谢

naoyixue

寻求帮助

sdcar2010

If (A) is right, then the conservation objective would not be served by carrying out the plan.

naoyixue

谢楼上的大眼美女， 真的漂亮。 但是问下， 知道a是eventually take over their leadership这句话就是最后这些人也变成和国企一样乐，但是就是看不出，怎么变成一样的，光光从这句话eventually take over their leadership， 谢谢。

sdcar2010

If A is true, Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the park would eventually take over the leadship. What would they do? Conserve the resource? Fat chance!

naoyixue

懂了，懂了， 谢谢。 ：）