GWD18Q20 这道题好乱。。。绕不出来了。。。

ssxxtt27

28. GWD-18-Q20

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.That plan is ill-conceived:if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.



In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?



A.The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.

B.The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.

C.The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.

D.The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.

E.The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

正答为A  我选的D  第二个划线句是ill-conceived的原因啊。。。怎么成了支持strategy的了。。。but之后才是支持strategy啊
求高手帮忙缕一缕。。。

Kb24

支持LZ，我也觉得是D啊，因为第一个划线的句子是个GOAL，并不是ill-conceived；最后一句话And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability，也是同样为了这个GOAL来努力的，从头到尾没有说这个GOAL本身是ill-conceived, 而是他们用来实现这个GOAL的PLAN是ill-conceived. 因为A是没啥道理的。

我也同意是D，请NN大侠们出来指点一下

ssxxtt27

支持LZ，我也觉得是D啊，因为第一个划线的句子是个GOAL，并不是ill-conceived；最后一句话And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability，也是同样为了这个GOAL来努力的，从头到尾没有说这个GOAL本身是ill-conceived, 而是他们用来实现这个GOAL的PLAN是ill-conceived. 因为A是没啥道理的。

我也同意是D，请NN大侠们出来指点一下

-- by 会员 Kb24 (2011/4/17 14:51:41)

我又想了想
第二个黑体句是一个条件句，表达的意思是：如果farming viable，农民就不卖地。然后后面开始阐述农民不可能remain viable，所以肯定会卖地。这样就advocate了买地的plan了 第二个黑体句就好比一个定理，下面的例子符合定理，则事实成立。所以第二个黑体句是basis。。。
这样理解D也成立
但始终觉得A也说得通。。。哎

小唯唯

正确答案就是D啊……可是我想问……D后面说argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. 哪里有strategy呀？？？

sdcar2010

正确答案就是D啊……可是我想问……D后面说argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. 哪里有strategy呀？？？

-- by 会员 小唯唯 (2011/4/19 20:13:36)

Here it is:
a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability

小唯唯

正确答案就是D啊……可是我想问……D后面说argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. 哪里有strategy呀？？？

-- by 会员 小唯唯 (2011/4/19 20:13:36)

Here it is:
a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/4/20 10:46:53)

“神来”，神就来了

onlysilence222

这个题明显就不能选A啊……这还用说

huihlin

ssxxtt27 发表于 2011-4-17 17:26
支持LZ，我也觉得是D啊，因为第一个划线的句子是个GOAL，并不是ill-conceived；最后一句话And that is e ...

同意！