ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3765|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 14 第一道逻辑题就把我给搞定了...求救赎...

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-5 14:08:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
2. GWD17-Q9: (CD-9 Q10)
Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?
A.    Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B.    The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
C.    The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D.    The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
E.    Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.
答案是B,那were not mostly projects 应该怎么解释?怎么看都像一无关选项...
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-5 15:40:24 | 只看该作者
哇~这个题我昨天还看了~我试着解释一下
批评家的证据是90%的被取消的项目都在反对党选区。但是被认定浪不浪费这个事儿是无党派人士写的报告。所以总统的选择基于sound budgetary policy而不是partisan politics

B选项说被认定为浪费的项目并不大部分在总统选区。
将选项取非:被认定浪费的项目大部分在总统选区,而题目讲90%被取消的项目都在反对党区,从而说明总统的选择基于partisan politics,削弱。

个人见解 求批评求讨论~!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-5 21:06:52 | 只看该作者
可是,这不是一道假设题嘛...为什么选一个削弱项呢...能不能再解释下勒...没整明白额
地板
发表于 2011-4-5 21:11:05 | 只看该作者
对于这种假设不好判断的题目,最好的办法就是排除无关选项后对可能项进行取非
5#
发表于 2011-4-5 21:24:07 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate B, you have "The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party." If this is true, and since we know that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in legislative districts controlled by opposition party, then we have a problem - clearly politics is involved in the cancellation.
6#
发表于 2011-4-5 21:51:56 | 只看该作者
可是,这不是一道假设题嘛...为什么选一个削弱项呢...能不能再解释下勒...没整明白额
-- by 会员 luckykirk (2011/4/5 21:06:52)




把选项取非如果削弱,原选项不就加强了么,假设假设和加强差不多~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 07:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部