[求助]大全-20-5

lingling2005

Sorry, I mean 'So 取非 (E) can not -> 取非 argument main idea'

xxiaoyan

d 是什么意思阿？不大明白

lindawen1

D)项目建完后不增加出租量的库存，与原文信息相违背，或者说原文的非重点信息

a 说白了就是改造的钱不必新建更省钱，即新建省钱，当然goverment is not guilty of any fiscal wasterful

一起加油的夥伴

我試著解釋看看

   In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
政府有意圖在一些城市中興建更多的的工程建築,儘管在大多的城市中已經有些閑置的辦公室可以出租(而且可以租給政府使用),但是並沒有符合公家機關想要的運作設備的需求, 因此政府的工程建造並不會是浪費的

找前提,

(A) 政府建造新大樓的成本跟承租閑置大樓的成本是一樣的

歡迎指教

一起加油的夥伴

我試著解釋看看

In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
政府有意圖在一些城市中興建更多的的工程建築,儘管在大多的城市中已經有些閑置的辦公室可以出租(而且可以租給政府使用),但是並沒有符合公家機關想要的運作設備的需求, 因此政府的工程建造並不會是浪費的

找前提,

(A) 政府建造新大樓的成本跟承租閑置大樓的成本是一樣的

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are most cost-effective

意思是說,在政府決定要建造新大樓之前,要先通過法律的許可,確定沒有其他的節省成本的替代方案才行

歡迎指正

zxppx

5.     In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
说明只有“租赁”才是处理空置办公空间最经济的办法，由于文中已经说明“租赁”是行不通的，所以政府并没有浪费。
“取非”，如果在能够满足要求的情况下，还有其他更cost-effective的方法，那么说明政府不经济，削弱原文
(B)  The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
Prefer A to B 更加喜欢A (leasing)，但是不能说明政府是否有经济效率
(C)  If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
文中已经指出“不满足”，但是不清楚到底是不是very close to
(D) The government’s construction projects would not on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
文中讨论的是unavailable for leasing，无关（A）
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are most cost-effective.
“取非”，政府不被法律要求采用最节约成本的方式来实施大型建筑计划。这能说明文中的政府就是浪费的吗？不一定，因为这个政府可能自己要求自己采用最节约的方式来建设。