ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7612|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教:大全-d-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-1 00:12:00 | 只看该作者

请教:大全-d-18

commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.



The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?



(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.



(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.



(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.



(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.B



(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.



请教, C为什么不行?为什么是B?偶觉得文章的意思是说主观的判断是不行的,由于这些艺术都让群众接受,所以我们只能客观的说,这些艺术是好的。


沙发
发表于 2004-6-1 01:49:00 | 只看该作者

I'm not sure.

Conclusion mentioned in C was never talked about in the paragraph, so it left only B for choice. But if B were right, it implies A, eah?

Besides, I'm confused by the structure of this line:

"commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective", please cows explain it?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-2 09:11:00 | 只看该作者
anyone give me a confirmed explanation?  thanks a lot!
地板
发表于 2004-6-4 05:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用GreenHorse在2004-6-1 1:49:00的发言:

"commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective", please cows explain it?


我不是cow,但我认为这句话的意思是“当谈到审美评价时,通常(人们认为)它是一种主观(行为)。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-4 5:30:48编辑过]
5#
发表于 2004-12-12 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
A为什么不对呢?B和A好像是一样的
6#
发表于 2004-12-13 14:00:00 | 只看该作者

A之所以不对是因为:critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art, but not always.


所以选项中这么说是太过绝对化。


C之所以不对是因为:The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next。文中表明reputation会fluctuate,但并不意味着会fluctuates greatly。


B之所以对是因为:commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are。这是文中作为事实来阐述的:in short term(means this applies to "contemporary work of art" as mentioned in choice B ),they are subjective——〉they are not objective。


但是觉得这种题太耗时,做起来烦躁。



那位兄弟有更好的对付这种题的方法,望不吝赐教!!!谢谢。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-14 5:04:10编辑过]
7#
发表于 2005-5-2 11:59:00 | 只看该作者

"...B之所以对是因为:commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are。这是文中作为事实来阐述的:in short term(means this applies to "contemporary work of art" as mentioned in choice B ),they are subjective——〉they are not objective..."

I am still confused. To summarize the main message in the question -

"commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are,  ...  But over time, the subjective element disappears ...".

It looks directly contradictory to B...

Can anyone help? Thanks in advance!


8#
发表于 2005-6-27 05:04:00 | 只看该作者

A之所以不对是因为3位名人是作为works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries的例子,得出的结论是we can objectively call them great。那么在之前名人们活着的时候,critics may subjectively call them great。


C不对,laywer已经解释过,原文没有说是the reputation of a work,而是the value of a work。

9#
发表于 2005-6-28 13:10:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sensornet在2005-6-27 5:04:00的发言:

A之所以不对是因为3位名人是作为works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries的例子,得出的结论是we can objectively call them great。那么在之前名人们活着的时候,critics may subjectively call them great。


C不对,laywer已经解释过,原文没有说是the reputation of a work,而是the value of a work。


since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art.

没有证据证明:critics may subjectively call them great。

还是觉得A的问题在于太绝对

open to discussion

10#
发表于 2005-6-28 13:40:00 | 只看该作者

本题是MUST TRUE题型。其实MUST TRUE几乎是最简单的一种题型。它的特点是,文章中会给出几条信息。它的读题方式是:如果文章给的信息之间有结合点,记住结合点(答案往往就是结合点),如果没有结合点,记住信息。如果是推理,记住推理链,用推理链中的项目去找答案。


本题为例。首先本题不是推理链。因此我们找信息。文章给出了两条信息:
1.当人们谈到艺术时,往往带有主观色彩,且短期内该主观是的确存在的,因为同时代的批评家们often在对艺术的评价上持不同观点。
2.随着时间的推移,主观色彩消失。比如,blablabla,几个世纪以来一直吸引着观众,证明了它们从客观角度讲是great的。


第一个信息说明的是,当人们刚接触艺术时观点是主观的;第二个信息说明的是,长期内这种主观就不存在了。于是产生了结合点--只有短期内是主观的。答案B。


其他答案:
A:持不同观点不等于完全否认价值,错。
B:短期内主观--完全符合原文信息,答案
C:文章只说客观价值要经历一段时间才能被发现,没有说一代一代在变动!
D:跟原文说的主观客观无关
E:批评家的话跟客观与否无关,错。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 16:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部