求解一道逻辑题

sissi8466

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals.  A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications.  Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications.  But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.


Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?      


(A) Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to the existence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previously thought to be untreatable
(B) Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised
(C) Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians
(D) Whether advertisements for prescription medications are currently an important source of information about newly available medications for physicians
(E) Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired


答案是E,我不明白为什么选E,请各位大侠解释下，还有这类的评价题我总找不到切入口，不知道依据什么来选答案，请各位指教下，还有假设题也是，快考试了，心里挺急的，想请教下对这两类题怎样做假设和做评价？谢谢！（评价的方法可以依照上面的列子讲解）

cycyang

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals.  A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications.  Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications.  But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.

在H，处方药的广告范围只能是医生这个群体，否则违法。一项新的法案正被提议，这个法案将容许处方药的广告延伸到公众领域。反对者认为这样会导致严重后果：广大受众缺乏专业知识评估广告的真假，因而可能会要求他们的医生开不适宜的处方。

结论：尽管如此，由于医生对开处方药有最终的决定权，所以不会导致更多的不适宜处方的开出。

(E) Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired
当医生原先开的处方没有达到理想中的医治效果时，医生是否会妥协于病人而开其所要求的处方。（结论成立的关键是医生有“final say”，如果妥协，则说明结论不成立；如果不妥协，则结论成立。）