in any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose. this is because the scope of a negotiating party's aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party.
which of the following is an assumption implicit in the passage above? A. the intensity with which parties conduct negotiations affects the outcome of those negotiations. B. negotiations almost always pit against one another parties whose aims differ in scope. C. the outcome of negotiations cannot be correctly predicted in advance. D. a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing. E. negotiating parties are typically not aware of the scope of each other's aims until the outcome os no longer in doubt.
试析 “the scope of a negotiating party's aims” determines "the energy and the perseverance"-------lose or not 所以“能量和恒心(the energy and the perseverance)” 是成败的关键,暗含“强度(intensity)”决定成败。
所以选A
选项D. a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing. 题干中只是提到了目标范围,而没有提到目标高低;同时,成败不仅取决于“perseverance”,还取决于“energy”.
A很直接的说出了假设 而D是无关选项 依然取非 若是A,则为:intensity和negotiation无关 那么原文的逻辑链断掉 而D:则为a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims DOES NOT need exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing 对原文无影响
试析 “the scope of a negotiating party's aims” determines "the energy and the perseverance"-------lose or not 所以“能量和恒心(the energy and the perseverance)” 是成败的关键,暗含“强度(intensity)”决定成败。
所以选A
选项D. a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing. 题干中只是提到了目标范围,而没有提到目标高低;同时,成败不仅取决于“perseverance”,还取决于“energy”.