Og 12-92，大家帮帮我~~~~~~

stellachen15

请教Og 12-92
In the country of Veltria, the past two years\' broad economic recession has included abusiness downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recesssion but returned to its prerecession lever in the second year.
which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid on time?
a .the total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recesssion and the second year.
b. between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
c. of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
d.clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
e relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work cloths, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

我理解C为什么正确，但是想不明白A为什么错误。如果范围扩大，那不就意味着更多的人能按时还钱，那不就解释了中间的矛盾吗？请指点

yarndyed

A的意思是wholesallers给retailers的信用额度增加了。

我觉得信用额度增加了不能够说明retailer就会按时还钱了，他该还不出还是还不出。
打个比方，某人有一张信用卡，5000块额度，但老是晚还钱。如果银行把他的额度提到10000块，他就会按时还钱了吗？这不合常理嘛。通常银行都会要么收他利息，要是他耍赖皮的话，干脆就让他破产。

个人见解，请指教

sdcar2010

LS is right. Common sense question.

stellachen15

A的意思是wholesallers给retailers的信用额度增加了。

我觉得信用额度增加了不能够说明retailer就会按时还钱了，他该还不出还是还不出。
打个比方，某人有一张信用卡，5000块额度，但老是晚还钱。如果银行把他的额度提到10000块，他就会按时还钱了吗？这不合常理嘛。通常银行都会要么收他利息，要是他耍赖皮的话，干脆就让他破产。

个人见解，请指教

-- by 会员 yarndyed (2011/3/18 22:49:56)

谢谢，你一说就解决了我想了半小时的问题。其实是因为没有理解选项的意识。逻辑里面很多这种引起的问题，都不知道该这么解决呢

yarndyed

谢谢，你一说就解决了我想了半小时的问题。其实是因为没有理解选项的意识。逻辑里面很多这种引起的问题，都不知道该这么解决呢

===========这个我也很困惑。我逻辑做得并不好，不是逻辑思维不好，而是题目意思没有看明白。基本上能看明白的题目就问题不大了。其实你想想，如果把所有的逻辑改成中文，那大家还不做的唰唰的

但问题是考试的时候又不能查字典，又紧张，又只有2分钟，怎么能保证把题目都看懂呢？很纠结，希望有NN出来给点建议

个人感觉，所谓技巧大部分都是浮云，看懂题目是王道。所有逻辑实际上是在考阅读啊

onlyonyou

同意#4观点!

lelechen1107

看了几天，越发觉得大部分逻辑还是在拚看不看得懂啊......
很少部分是真正的在看逻辑的...

MissUindeed

做过一遍，答案都记住了直接跳过分析怎么破

calmmer

haha 查这道题看到几年前的帖子 估计楼上们都和G拜拜很久了 我也有同感 逻辑看懂题是王道啊 我多数错误都是因为看不懂题 真心崩溃。。。GMAT VERBAL 的精髓还是考阅读能力啊 这是最基本的