狒狒一道 不解的题 救命呀

呼啸700

73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated. (答案)
(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.

(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.

(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.

(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.


这是个啥思路 牛牛们 帮忙看看



(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.

(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.

(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.

(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.


这是个啥思路 牛牛们 帮忙看看

cycyang

(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
“科学实验在能够被复制之前其成果可以盛行很多年（无人能挑战）。”

文中的意思是“科学家的工作在发表前必须经过官方审核（officially confirmed）的规定是没有理由的，原因是现在已有一套审核机制通过其他科学家重复结果来“confirm”或”disconfirm"科学发现。如果所做科学工作的质量很差，不会带来不良影响。因为其他科学家会对此进行曝光，从而“disconfirm”这项工作。”

矛盾就是：如果其他科学工作者需要很长时间来做这个重复性验证（如很多年），那么这项科研成果，即使质量低劣，也会盛行一时，带来负面影响的。所以选A

呼啸700

晓得了  呵呵

sylvieliu

那这里B错在哪。。。

zxppx

7.     There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific finding, namely, the replication 重复of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
那这样的话，那些可能有问题的科学研究就会存在很长时间，可能导致很多问题产生，因为它们本身就是有问题的
(B)  Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
给别人看，但是没有提到别人是否会replicate the results
(C)  Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
这只能说他们在做实验的时候可能会更加小心，但是不能说明错误的研究就是无害的
(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.（A）
(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.