- UID
- 601759
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-1-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
84. Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfi tes, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers whoadd sulfites to none of the winesthey produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfi tes can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfi tes.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfi tes by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine. (B) Not all forms of sulfi te are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction. (C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfi tes are commonly added. (D) Apart from sulfi tes, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction. (E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.
OG解释说 D选项与原文无关,为什么呀? 还有E选项,说到Sulfites的量的问题,可是原文已经说add sulfites to none of the wines啊,E和原文有什么关联呢?
求指教~!O(∩_∩)O谢谢
|
|