ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3197|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12-84 D选项 纠结死我得了

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-14 23:34:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
84. Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfi tes, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers whoadd  sulfites  to none of the winesthey produce, people who would like to drink
wine but are allergic to sulfi tes can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfi tes.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfi tes by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
(B) Not all forms of sulfi te are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction.
(C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfi tes are commonly added.
(D) Apart from sulfi tes, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.


OG解释说 D选项与原文无关,为什么呀?
还有E选项,说到Sulfites的量的问题,可是原文已经说add  sulfites  to none of the wines啊,E和原文有什么关联呢?

求指教~!O(∩_∩)O谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-15 00:26:17 | 只看该作者
E:focus on NATURALLY present....是说它自己本身没有sulfites..都是添加进去的..

D:原文都在提及因为sulfites (in wine)导致的allergic reaction....

negate D:Apart from sulfi tes, there are SOME substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction

看原文的conclusion :without risking an allergic reaction to SULFI TES  

D仅说allergic..conclusion是说不会有因为sulfi导致的allergic..不能削弱原文推理..
板凳
发表于 2011-3-15 06:24:32 | 只看该作者
The answer is E.  Since the question is about a necessary assumption, use the negation method. If you negate E, then sulfites ARE naturally present in the wines in large enough amount to cause allergic reaction.  If this is true, those wine without added preservatives are also problematic. Then the argument that allergic people can avoid sulfites by choosing wines without preservatives will not hold.

We do not care anything other than sulfite when looking for an assumption.
地板
发表于 2011-3-15 15:32:34 | 只看该作者
naturally~surely

E选项没有排除wines里面添加Sulfites这一可能性,只是强调添加的amount不见得会大到造成allergy...题目当中最后一句的risk表明了allergy不是必然。。

D的问题是,题目从来没这么说过,而是一直在针对Sulfites引起的allergy提出解决方案。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-23 21:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部