ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1611|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教各位一道GWD

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-14 15:11:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complication并发症s from influenza, are commonly vaccinated.  A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children.  However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.    Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
B.    The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.
C.    The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
D.    Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
E.    The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.
请问答案是什么   并且能给个解释么   谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-14 15:42:17 | 只看该作者
However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.


应该是D
将  adults who are at risk of serious complications from influenza  和 children 联系起来了

逻辑题的重点一般在题干后面,要注意
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-31 13:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部