ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2327|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全test18-3

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-14 11:53:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A 20 percent decline in lobster catches in Maine waters since 1980 can be justifiably blamed on legislation passed in 1972 to protect harbor seals. Maine’s population of harbor(海港,避难所) seals is now double the level existing before protection was initiated, and these seals are known to eat both fish and lobsters.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?
(A) Harbor seals usually eat more fish than lobsters, but the seals are natural predators (食肉动物)of both.
(B) Although harbor seals are skillful predators of lobsters, they rarely finish eating their catch.
(C) Harbor seals attract tourists to Maine’s coastal areas, thus revitalizing(使复兴) the local economy.
(D) Authors of the 1972 legislation protecting harbor seals were convinced that an increase in that animal’s numbers would not have a measurably negative impact on the lobster catch.E
(E) The record lobster harvests of the late 1970’s removed large numbers of mature lobsters from the reproductive stock.
请帮忙解释一下E说的是啥啊。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-14 15:58:58 | 只看该作者
1970年的龙虾捕获大丰收,导致大量的准备生小龙虾的老龙虾们被搞死了。。。因此70年代以后的龙虾捕获量大大减少啦 -- 因此SEAL不是罪魁祸首 - 他因削弱
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-21 17:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部