ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5901|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[学校信息] 2010年各top MBA进入各大公司情况(From Poets and Quants)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-13 02:43:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
http://poetsandquants.com/2010/12/23/bcg-expanded-mba-hiring-this-year

BCG Expanded MBA Hiring This Yearby John A. Byrne

McKinsey & Co., one of the largest and most sophisticated of MBA recruiters, had a field day at Wharton this year. The elite consulting firm hired 44 MBAs from Wharton’s Class of 2010. Yet as large as that number seems, it was lower than the recruiting haul a year earlier when McKinsey snapped up 50 Wharton MBAs. No matter. Rival Boston Consulting Group more than made up the difference at Wharton. BCG hired 43 MBAs from the school this year, a dozen more than the 31 hires it took from Wharton in 2009.

These fascinating facts and more are buried in the just released 2010 employment reports of the top business schools. Not all the schools have published this data yet, and many schools fail to disclose the top employers for their MBAs as well as the specific number of recruits by each company. Nonetheless, there’s a wealth of interesting data in the few publicly released reports from such top schools as Chicago, Columbia, Wharton, Kellogg, MIT, Berkeley, Duke and Michigan.

This year, for example, McKinsey was the number one MBA recruiter at Wharton, Columbia, Chicago, and MIT Sloan. Besides the decline at Wharton, though, McKinsey recruited 12 fewer grads at Columbia (38 this year vs. 46 in 2009) and seven fewer MBAs from MIT (15 this year vs. 24 in 2009). Yet, at the same time, McKinsey increased its hiring at both Kellogg (hiring 32 this year vs. 26 in 2009) and Chicago (hiring 24 vs. 23 in 2009).

BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP APPEARS MOST AGGRESSIVE MBA RECRUITER IN 2010.

Of the major consulting firms, BCG seemed to be the most aggressively expanding MBA hirer. The firm increased its hiring at Kellogg (hiring 35 in 2010 vs. 23 in 2009), Chicago (hiring 19 in 2010 vs. 9 in 2009), Wharton (43 in 2010 vs. 31 in 2009), Columbia (25 in 2010 vs. 21 in 2009), and MIT (14 in 2010 vs. 8 in 2009). James Platt, a BCG partner with responsibility for MBA hiring, confirmed in an earlier news report that the consulting firm  has been growing at double digit rate rates since 2003. “BCG is continuing with our successful MBA recruiting in 2010,” he said. “We recognise the MBA as an outstanding achievement and will continue to focus on the top European, UK and US business schools.”

No other major MBA recruiter posted larger across-the-board increases with the exception of some of the financial services firms, such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, whose hiring was fueled by a recovery from the severe economic recession in 2008-09. Goldman Sachs more than doubled its hires of Columbia Business School grads this year, employing 17 vs. eight in 2009. It also hired 13 Wharton MBAs, vs. nine a year earlier, and six from MIT, up from five in 2009. Morgan Stanley, meantime, doubled its hires from both Columbia and Chicago. Ten Columbia MBAs went to Goldman this year, up from five in 2009, while 11 went to the firm from Chicago, up from five a year earlier.
BCG was the single biggest hirer of MBAs at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management, employing 35 grads from the Class of 2010.  Johnson & Johnson was the number one company hiring Duke MBAs, bringing on 18, while Amazon.com was the single biggest employer for MBAs at the University of Michigan’s Ross School, hiring 15 this year.

Deloitte Consulting apparently found Columbia, Duke, Michigan and Berkeley to be happy hunting grounds for MBAs. The firm hired a dozen MBAs from both Columbia and from Duke and 11 from Michigan. Deloitte also hired the most MBAs from Berkeley’s Haas School in 2010, taking away 11 grads. Microsoft brought aboard eight MBAs from Kellogg this year, along with seven from Wharton, and another five from Michigan. Bank of America, meantime, hired 11 MBAs each from Duke and Chicago, 10 from Wharton, and four from Columbia Business School.

A STANFORD MBA LANDS A $330,000-A-YEAR JOB IN PRIVATE EQUITY.

While these firms were among the largest employers of elite MBAs, they didn’t necessarily pay the highest starting pay packages. The highest reported salary by a Class of 2010 MBA came from a graduate of Stanford who went into the private equity/leveraged buyout field. That person, anonymous in the pile of combined statistics on salaries of grads, told Stanford he landed a job at an unidentified private equity or LBO firm paying a salary of $330,000 a year. Another Stanford MBA won a job with a venture capital firm for $250,000 a year, while yet another joined a hedge fund for a $200,000-a-year salary.

At Harvard Business School, private equity firms were among the highest paying recruiters of MBAs as well. The median salary for an MBA going into private equity this year was $135,000, but some Harvard grads were paid much more. The school reports that the 75th percentage of the range of salaries among MBAs going into private equity was $185,000. The median signing bonus was $35,000, while the median additional guaranteed compensation was a whopping $155,000. Of course, these firms tend to recruit fewer MBA candidates–typically fewer than the fingers on one hand–and only at the most elite business schools.

See results below for the big MBA recruiters (An asterisk indicates that a company hired at least three MBAs. When a minus sign appears before a 3 and an asterisk it indicates the company hired fewer than three MBAs.):

[attachimg]85390[/attachimg]
[attachimg]85391[/attachimg]
[attachimg]85392[/attachimg]
[attachimg]85393[/attachimg]

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2011-3-13 03:17:44 | 只看该作者
好东西,顶
没有tuck有点可惜
板凳
发表于 2011-3-13 09:40:22 | 只看该作者
UCLA的数据呢?有没有??

这个可以有!
地板
发表于 2011-3-13 11:32:45 | 只看该作者
HBS没有?
5#
发表于 2011-3-13 12:42:00 | 只看该作者
哥伦比亚真是威武
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-13 13:33:08 | 只看该作者
这里边能清晰看到各校的区别
金融里面Chicago, Wharton, Columbia优势极其明显,压倒性优势。金融表格里chicago 103人,Wharton 94人, Columbia 116人。而Kellogg,Duke,Michigan和MIT加起来才107人,还没有Columbia一所学校多。

咨询在这三所学校的基础上再加上Kellogg和MIT。Kellogg,Wharton和Columbia都有上百人去顶级咨询公司(三校分别是126,130和114人)

Tech里面MIT明显全面开花,Kellogg也有很强的presence

general management则是Kellogg的天下。

所以,物以类聚人以群分,想做金融,去Booth,Columbia和Wharton
想做咨询,去Booth,Columbia, Wharton, Kellogg
要做Tech,去Kellogg或MIT
要做general management,Kellogg不做第二人想。

M7和其他学校的差距,从这些数据也能看出有多明显。
7#
发表于 2011-3-13 16:24:50 | 只看该作者
hbs stanford 牛到不屑提供数据供统计?有buyside的数据,可能更有意价值。
8#
发表于 2011-3-13 18:52:36 | 只看该作者
老的掉牙的信息了。
9#
发表于 2011-3-14 00:05:39 | 只看该作者
谁能说说HAAS怎么回事?怎么全是NA?
他们的毕业生都去哪工作了?
10#
发表于 2011-3-14 02:39:28 | 只看该作者
haas首先出来创业的比一般学校的要多,另外很多去了些加州有成长性的bio-tech或是clean-tech的中型公司没有被list上来,但这些公司无论是pay还是将来的发展都超好
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-26 13:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部