大全test12-12,谢谢啦~

fengchen318

After graduating from high school, people rarely multiply fractions（少部分） or discuss ancient Rome, but they are confronted（面临，遭遇） daily with decisions relating to home economics. Yet whereas mathematics and history are required courses in the high school curriculum（全部课程）, home economics is only an elective（选修科目）, and few students choose to take it.
Which of the following positions would be best supported by the considerations above?
(A) If mathematics and history were not required courses, few students would choose to take them.
(B) Whereas home economics would be the most useful subject for people facing the decisions they must make in daily life, often mathematics and history can also help them face these decisions.
(C) If it is important to teach high school students subjects that relate to decisions that will confront them in their daily lives, then home economics should be made an important part of the high school curriculum.
(D) Mathematics, history, and other courses that are not directly relevant to a person’s daily life should not be a required part of the high school curriculum.
(E) Unless high schools put more emphasis on nonacademic subjects like home economics, people graduating from high school will never feel comfortable about making the decisions that will confront them in their daily lives.

答案是C，我选B,谢谢各位啦~

emilyz0301

LZ怎么会选成B呢. B说math and history也会帮助他们解决这些问题，这完全是错误的，文中根本没有这个说法。而C非常符合文意，数学和历史根本对以后生活没用，反而是home economics非常useful但却是选修课程。因此高中应该改教学生对他们生活有用的课，而home economics就是这样的课

fengchen318

LZ怎么会选成B呢. B说math and history也会帮助他们解决这些问题，这完全是错误的，文中根本没有这个说法。而C非常符合文意，数学和历史根本对以后生活没用，反而是home economics非常useful但却是选修课程。因此高中应该改教学生对他们生活有用的课，而home economics就是这样的课

-- by 会员 emilyz0301 (2011/3/11 15:37:06)

哦~呵呵，其实我是一开始就不是很明白，题目到底要加强哪一部分。。。不太明白condsideration指的是什么，谢谢你啦~现在明白多了~