ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery-a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease-only 75 percent benefited from the surgery. Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3889|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

65岁病人

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-8 11:38:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q17:
Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery—a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease—only 75 percent benefited from the surgery.Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?


  1. Many of the patients who receive coronary bypass surgery are less than 55 years old.
  2. Possible benefits of coronary bypass surgery include both relief from troubling symptoms and prolongation of life.
  3. Most of the patients in the survey decided to undergo coronary bypass surgery because they were advised that the surgery would reduce their risk of future heart attacks.
  4. The patients over 65 years old who did not benefit from the coronary bypass surgery were as fully informed as those who did benefit from the surgery as to the risks of the surgery prior to undergoing it.
  5. The patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery but who did not benefit from it were medically indistinguishable, prior to their surgery, from the patients who did benefit.



    大家看看 D 和E 一个说是 风险都被提前告知  另一个是说 用药都一样
    这两个应该怎么区分呢~~     谢谢大家啦  

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-8 11:54:27 | 只看该作者
The argument says that the doctor gives wrong information to one-fourth of the patients because the doctors wants to earn money from these patient even though the surgery would not help them.

E says that the doctor cannot tell whether a patient will benefit from the surgery BEFORE operating on them. Thus they not motivated by money when telling those one-fourth patients that they need a surgery.

D, on the other hand, mentions a complete irrelevant aspect of the precedure.  Out of scope.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-9 19:39:42 | 只看该作者
D  E  说的不都是 在手术之前的平等对待吗???大侠
地板
发表于 2011-3-9 20:03:56 | 只看该作者
If the doctor wants to cheat the patients who do not need to undergo surgery, telling these patients that the surgery has certain risks does not make the doctor less wrong. They are still wrong!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-9 20:19:14 | 只看该作者
Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.  

the question requires us to find the undermined choice, that means the the doctors were not interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fees than in helping the patient, the doctor indeed wants to help the patient

the choice E says  they teat the patient with inditinguished medicine, that means, not interested in the fees ,  however, choice D is passed out only because the article doesn't mention the risk ? But it does~~the risk is 1/4.......sorry~~~ maybe I am in the corner and can not get out,,,but ~~~I really quite understand this question>>>>>......  Thank you ~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 14:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部