题目如下 151. If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental. (A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of (B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating (C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of (D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating (E) Should Dr. Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating according to OG explanation, C is not correct becase it violates parallelism with eating of. I don't understand why C violates parallelism, I think that eating of parallel with excelling at, the prepositional can not be omitted. for example, OG40, the choice D.
谷歌了一下大家的回答,有个是这么回答的 OG151 - 'eating highly processed foods' and 'excelling at sports' is inparallel. The 'eating' in 'eating of xxx' is a noun, not a verb, whilethe 'excelling at' in 'excelling at sports' is a verb. so 'eating of'can't be in parallel with the 'excelling at'.
但是怎么知道eating of 中的eating 不是动词呢? 就是个人会错选为 eating of 与 excelling at 平行