ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4074|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG151 求助。 关于eating of 中的eating 为什么不是动词?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-5 00:20:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目如下
151. If Dr.

Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
(A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of
(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating
(C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of
(D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating
(E) Should Dr. Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating
according to OG explanation, C is not correct becase it violates parallelism with eating of.  I don't understand why C violates parallelism, I think that eating of parallel with excelling at, the prepositional can not be omitted. for example, OG40, the choice D.



谷歌了一下大家的回答,有个是这么回答的
OG151 - 'eating highly processed foods' and 'excelling at sports' is inparallel. The 'eating' in 'eating of xxx' is a noun, not a verb, whilethe 'excelling at' in 'excelling at sports' is a verb. so 'eating of'can't be in parallel with the 'excelling at'.

但是怎么知道eating of 中的eating 不是动词呢?
就是个人会错选为 eating of 与 excelling at 平行
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-5 11:10:28 | 只看该作者
白勇上解释:为了保持平行,有时需要用某动词的名词形式,但有些动词没有名词形式,还需要和句子里其他成分表示平行的情况下,就用the+动词-ing的形式充当这个动词的名词~明白不?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-8 12:16:41 | 只看该作者
哦~ O(∩_∩)O谢谢啦~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 19:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部