OG 12

moonphone

I c,thanks!

richard-ma

以下是引用lwj19329在2004-12-5 9:16:00的发言：

再问OG12：

其中的are not subject to the applicability of 怎么翻译？

不好意思有点笨。3KS！

同问，这句怎么翻译？怎么重复了？

foreinter

以下是引用junehi在2005-1-20 10:24:00的发言：

如果没有are, 为什么会有将formulas 与big businesses进行比较的嫌疑呢？还是不太明白。。。。

我想我是句子结构没有搞清楚。

请指教，谢谢！！

对于这个问题，哪位再给解释一下，多谢

titatita

以下是引用richard-ma在2005-7-14 11:56:00的发言：

同问，这句怎么翻译？怎么重复了？

Because new small businesses are growing and are seldom in equilibrium, formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to them in the same way as to established big businesses.

因为新的小企业正在成长中且很少处于平衡状态,现金流量的公式和负债权益比率应用在他们身上与应用在已建立的大公司不同.

titatita

subject to

v.
使服从, 使遭受

既然能用一个动词apply就不要用applicability,为了给applicability加个动词又唠唠叨叨地加subject to

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-29 12:19:04编辑过]

wycg

In A, the they after because is ambiguous; it seems illogically to refer to Formulas because they and Formulas are each the grammatical subject of a clause and because the previous they refers to Formulas. In A and B, do not apply to... in the same way as they do to is wordy and awkward. D, the best choice, says more concisely in the same way as to. Also in B, because they refers to formulas, the introductory clause states confusedly that the formulas are growing. In C and E, subject to the [same] applicability of... is wordy, awkward, and imprecise; furthermore, are is preferable either before or after established big businesses to complete the comparison. Finally, the referent of they is not immediately clear in E.

这是OG的解试

haijung

以下是引用clelia在2004-12-12 21:01:00的发言：

我想，

lwj19329的意思是说这一句：

In C and E, subject to the [same] applicability of... is wordy, awkward, and imprecise; furthermore, are is preferable either before or after established big businesses to complete the comparison.

我也有相同的问题。求教~~

thanks~

今天思考這個為什麼要在established big business後面加are的問題，記得有一條比較規則是如果是主語的比較，後面謂語賓語可以被省略,不過我後來想想這裡的謂語不同耶，暫且不論C和E其他的錯誤，new small businesses是 "are not" subject to...但是established big businesses是 "are" subject to...一個是否定，一個是肯定，所以要保留賓語做比較。請各位牛牛幫忙檢視我這樣的想法正確嗎?? 拜託囉~~ 謝謝~~

荷包里的月亮

以下是引用jameswoods在2005-1-30 16:01:00的发言：

谢谢，我又查了一下，还有Stoneren的解释，主语后有宾语部分，比较部分的主语后的系动词不能省。

我不是很明白啊... 对不起, 可不可以帮我解释一下呢? 究竟什么情况下不能省略?自己靠语感读过来觉得不能少, 可是说不出道理来, 着急

autumn713

給荷包裡的月亮

我覺得這一題的

are要補出應該是平行結構beV省略的方法

因為A***as B*** 原句應該是small biz are not subjected to***as big biz are (subjected to***)

所以B are (subjected to***)的VPP跟前面A的一樣 因此省略VPP保留be V.

如果你要把它看成是因為兩相比較

small biz are not subjected to O. as big biz are (subjected to***) 時候餵了確定大企業的主格地位 所以補be V 應該也勉強解釋的通

不過我個人比較傾向第一種解釋方法 給你參考一下囉

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-5 21:46:59编辑过]

荷包里的月亮

看了LSgg的解释, 好像明白了, B是不是也是这样, 确定they do是多余的呢, 按照比较省略来解释B的话, 似乎有点怪怪的, Because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium, formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to new small businesses
                in the same way as they do
                to established big businesses. 也就是formulas do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as formulas apply to XXX. 省略掉相同的部分, 就剩下formulas do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as to XXX? 是这样嘛? 还是有其他的关于way的固定搭配在里边.

觉得晕晕, 请帮我解答好嘛? 十分感谢噜