ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2550|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]一道补充材料的题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-26 10:07:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]一道补充材料的题

In the course of her researches, a historian recently
   found two documents mentioning the same person,
   Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a
   record of Schnitzler’s arrest for peddling without a
   license. The second, undated, is a statement by
   Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off
   and on for 20 years.


   The facts above best support which of the following
   conclusions?
   (A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
   (B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
   (C) The undated document was written before 1765.
   (D) The arrest record was written after the undated
       document.
   (E) The arrest record provides better evidence that
       Schnitzler peddled than does the undated
       document.
答案是c.怎么也看不出来这道题根1765有什么关系啊?1739年的是S的非法经商的拘捕记录。第二个没有日期的证据是S自己说的自己已经非法经商20年了。只能说明S至少是从1719年以前开始经商的。

沙发
发表于 2004-5-26 13:00:00 | 只看该作者

In the course of her researches, a historian recently
   found two documents mentioning the same person,
   Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a
   record of Schnitzler’s arrest for peddling without a
   license. The second, undated, is a statement by
   Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off
   and on for 20 years.
   The facts above best support which of the following
   conclusions?
   (A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
   (B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
   (C) The undated document was written before 1765.
   (D) The arrest record was written after the undated
       document.
   (E) The arrest record provides better evidence that
       Schnitzler peddled than does the undated
       document.
答案是c.怎么也看不出来这道题根1765有什么关系啊?1739年的是S的非法经商的拘捕记录。第二个没有日期的证据是S自己说的自己已经非法经商20年了。只能说明S至少是从1719年以前开始经商的。

我看这题的时候扫了一下5个选项,然后开始研究这两个带的数字选项a和c 很明显c是答案, 前面给了连个条件 归纳题一般会用全 题中的条件:你两个条件看一下文中说 都记录了一件事 那么这件事一定法正在这两个记录之前 (要不写记录的人就没法写了) 1739+20= 1759 第二个记录一定在1759前。 c 当然是很好的支持。 1765 前。看清楚是上面支持下面。

支持题是不需要充分的, 只要能对题目构成支持就行。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-27 22:51:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得不是,第二个记录应该是确定在39年以前的,因为39年s已经被拘留了,而第二份记录是s自己说he has been peddling off and on for 20 years. 应该是已经非法经商了20年,而39年他已经被捕。从那以后就不可能有记录了。
地板
发表于 2004-5-27 23:33:00 | 只看该作者
2楼的解释是正确的。被抓可不是一定被监禁哦
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-31 21:23:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 09:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部