ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5345|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

argument和conclusion有区别么?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-10 20:39:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目中的weaken(或者是strengthen)the argument及the conclusion有区别么?我看manhattan上说可以把argument看成conclusion不知道NN们在有什么心得?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-2-10 21:36:09 | 只看该作者
conclusion is part of the argument. But if you can cast doubt on the conclusion, you can weaken the argument.

So in terms of weakening, the difference between the two is subtle.
板凳
发表于 2011-2-11 05:50:12 | 只看该作者
argument means line of reasoning. It includes the premises and the conclusion.However, according to GMAT logic. Premises usually will remain untouchable. It means the author of the argument believes his conclusion is true based on the facts-premises. premises are facts that lead to conclusion. thus, when you see weaken the argument. you need to attack the conclusion.

to strengthen the argument is to support the conclusion by providing additional information(premises) to prove the author's conclusion is true or to further prove the premises are acurate or true.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-2-11 11:58:43 | 只看该作者
灰常感谢LS的回答,NN们还有什么心得都发表下,
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-30 09:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部