ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 菲尔乐
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[洛基] 拾贰月贰拾肆日起洛基整理(而零一一年一越二十八9:00更新)——一百三十六只

[精华] [复制链接]
121#
发表于 2011-1-12 11:55:47 | 只看该作者
樓主好像上傳錯檔了
現在的附件還是昨天總共73的那份

感謝LZ
122#
发表于 2011-1-12 14:31:54 | 只看该作者
楼主啊,怎么我下的版本还是73个题呢?标题不是说有79只吗?
123#
发表于 2011-1-12 14:36:47 | 只看该作者
lz辛苦啦!谢了。。
124#
发表于 2011-1-13 00:49:38 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Math/thread-512727-1-1.html
125#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-13 08:15:35 | 只看该作者

抱歉,上班没时间过来看,反馈慢了,现在全部更新了

楼主啊,怎么我下的版本还是73个题呢?标题不是说有79只吗?
-- by 会员 我爱伊乔 (2011/1/12 14:31:54)

126#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-13 08:17:04 | 只看该作者

抱歉,上班没能及时来看,现在全部更新了哦,祝好成绩

樓主好像上傳錯檔了
現在的附件還是昨天總共73的那份

感謝LZ
-- by 会员 nowel (2011/1/12 11:55:47)

127#
发表于 2011-1-13 21:04:48 | 只看该作者
52题是 旧prep32
81题是 GWD26-Q22, 变体 GWD27-Q28
80、84很眼熟,不知是GWD,还是prep,还是1022-1125的寂静,请考古。
幸苦,谢谢!!!
128#
发表于 2011-1-13 21:06:18 | 只看该作者
还有,85是不是应该合并到25?
129#
发表于 2011-1-13 21:56:20 | 只看该作者
52题  
PREP 2

32.(31313-!-item-!-188;#058&006235)

Paleontologist: About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines.These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. any bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.

In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



(A) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis (Answer)
(B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.

(B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.
(C) The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.

(D) The first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion.

(E) The first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.
130#
发表于 2011-1-13 22:03:07 | 只看该作者
63题 淋雨带伞 考古

V1(710) 有一个调查问卷,两组人,告知一组人故事主人公有伞,告知另一组人故事主人公没有伞,结果后一组认为故事结尾会下大暴雨的比例大,结论我忘了,貌似是什么可以应用在广告中的,反正是一道很有意思的题。
V2 (760) 实验把人分两组,告诉第一组中的人故事中的人带了伞,告诉第二组中的人故事中的人不带,结果第二组的人觉得故事的结尾会下暴雨。结论是(这里没看懂)貌似的人们觉得现实里没有准备的人结果会比有准备的人惨(我的理解),问assumption.我选的是:at least会有一些人把故事与对现实看法联系起来
V3 (720) 有个CR说这个表演班有两个组,一个组的人被告诉说故事中的人带了伞,另一组的人被告诉不带伞。结果被告知不带伞的人回应说什么。。。不记得了。。。Caught by the rain。。。结论是某些人说人们如果没有anticipate某件事情会发生的话 往往导致人们遭遇到不好的事情。。这个没读通。。我选的是那个at least some of the participant在现实里怎样怎样。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-25 02:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部