ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2503|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

马上就要考试了,但还是有一道AI毫无头绪,请好心人帮忙,感激不尽。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-4 16:00:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
AI
Portrayals of violence have proven commercially successful in television programs, movies, songs, and other forms of popular entertainment. Therefore, those who create popular entertainment should continue to incorporate violence into their products.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-5 13:00:25 | 只看该作者
怎么没人理我呢 麻烦大家了 说点自己的想法吧 实在想不出来了 找范文也没找到
板凳
发表于 2010-12-6 00:28:25 | 只看该作者
我也是正在复习准备2月考试的 一点想法希望有帮助..
这道题是 B10. Portrayals of violence have proven commercially successful in television programs, movies, songs, and other forms of popular entertainment. Therefore, those who create popular entertainment should continue to incorporate violence into their products. 中文的大概意思是-
在电视节目、电影、歌曲及其他形式的大众娱乐节目中加入暴力被证明是成功的商业模式。因此,那些创做流行的娱乐节目的人应该继续将其纳入到自己的产品中去。个人觉得这个题跟AI054很接近,即:AI054 Popular entertainment is overly influenced by commercial interests. Superficiality, obscenity, and violence characterize films and televsion today because those qualities are commercially successful.

这里提供一个Gemj在另外一个贴给AI054提供的范文 for your reference 加油~!


Clearly, most popular films and television shows are superficial and/or include a certain amount of violence or obscenity. Just as clearly, popularity leads to commercial success. But can we conclude that these productions are overly influenced by commercial interests? Perhaps not, since some popular films and television shows are neither superficial, obscene, nor violent. Closer scrutiny, however, reveals that most such productions actually support, not disprove, the thesis that commercial interests dictate movie and television content. (哪有必要作这样的二次转折)
One would-be (自称自许的)threat to the thesis can be found in lower-budget independent films, which tend to focus more on character development and topical social issues than on sensationalism. Recently, a few such films have supplanted Hollywood’s major studio productions as top box-office (adj.
票房的) hits. Does this mean that profit potential no longer dictates the content of films? No; it simply suggests that the tastes and preferences of the movie-going public are shifting.A second ostensible challenge to the thesis can be found in companies such as Disney, whose productions continue to achieve great popularity and commercial success, without resort to an appeal to baser interests. Yet it is because these productions are commercially successful that they proliferate.
The only cogent challenge to the thesis is found in perennial television favorites such as “Nova,” a public television show that is neither commercially supported nor influenced. However, such shows are more in the nature of education than entertainment, and for every one program like “Nova” there are several equally popular—and highly superficial—programs.
With few exceptions, then, commercial success of certain films and television shows is no accidental byproduct of popularity; it is the intentional result of producers’ efforts to maximize profits.







地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-6 08:15:43 | 只看该作者
非常感谢 祝你考个好成绩啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 14:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部