ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1904|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD27-Q5

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-2 21:14:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD27-Q 3 to Q6:

Twoopposing scenarios, the “arboreal” hypothesis and the “cursorial” hypothesis,have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The“arboreal” hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing treesand gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers: the heightof trees provides a good starting place for launching flight, especiallythrough gliding. As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolvedand birds finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes intuitive sense,but certain aspects are troubling. Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) andits maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, suchas feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, butno convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have bothclimbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than afew meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found.Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous withgliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, arecapable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows noobvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hindlimbs.

 The “cursorial”(running) hypothesis holds that small dinosaurs ran alongthe ground and stretched out their arms for balance as they leaped into the airafter insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even rudimentary feathers onforelimbs could have expanded the arm’s surface area to enhance lift slightly.Larger feathers could have increased lift incrementally, until sustained flightwas gradually achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not provide the accelerationproduced by dropping out of a tree; an animal would have to run quite fast totake off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve high speeds. Thecursorial hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the immediate theropoddinosaur ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the traits neededfor high lift off speeds: they were small, agile, lightly built, long-legged, andgood runners. And because they were bipedal, their arms were free to evolveflapping flight, which cannot be said for other reptiles of their time.



Q 5: Which of thefollowing is included in the discussion of the cursorial hypothesis but not inthe discussion of the arboreal hypothesis?

A.   A discussion of some of the features of Archaeopteryx

B.   A description of the environment known tohave been inhabited by bird ancestors

C.   A possible reason why birdancestors might have been engaging in activities that eventually evolvedinto flight

D.   A description of the obvious features ofanimals with gliding ability

E.    An estimate of the amount of time it tookfor bird ancestors to evolve the kind of flapping flight that allowed them tobecome completely airborne



我想知道为什么是C

前一种从树上下来拍着下来的方式不能算是“why birdancestors might have been engaging in activities that eventually evolvedinto flight”吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-5 12:51:31 | 只看该作者
顶一下...
板凳
发表于 2010-12-6 01:23:26 | 只看该作者
你也知道那是一个方式,只是纯粹描述行为。但文章没有说他们为什么要从树上拍着下来。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-14 16:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部