ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1478|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问到逻辑题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-10 14:52:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, howver, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the arguement to be properly drawn?

No gegraphical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.

谁能帮我解释一下吗?怎么推导出来的?谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-11-10 15:24:04 | 只看该作者
NO gegraphical area ever supports MORE THAN THREE similar species at the same time.
==>the ELEVEN of the specimens  come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time CANNOT come from SIMILAR species.
==> some of them must be the fossil specimens of other species(not triceratops)
==> the classification is unjustified(Because it use other animals' fossil specimens  to classify triceratops into sixteen species)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-10 16:38:10 | 只看该作者
不好意思,还是不太明白,再具体点可以吗?谢谢啦
地板
发表于 2010-11-10 17:02:51 | 只看该作者
选项No gegraphical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.说明没有一个地方可以同时支持三种类似的物种。
the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.
但是,题目中考古学家用了11种在同一个地方同一时期的样本来作分类的依据。
some of them must be the fossil specimens of other species(not triceratops)那很显然不可能11种都是类似的物种,所以不可能都是三角龙类。
the classification is unjustified(Because it use other animals' fossil specimens  to classify triceratops into sixteen species) 所以考古学家的研究是有问题的,怎么能用非三角龙的样本来作三角龙的分类依据呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 01:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部