ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: majia20112011
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[咨询答疑] 关于商科phd对什么要求更高的讨论:数学,文采,idea? judy修改

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2010-11-10 20:11:39 | 只看该作者
90% of the people who read your paper will only read your abstract and at most introduction. If your introduction is not good enough , they would think the paper to be quite uninteresting and would ignore the rest.

文采?
真的吗?
你说gmat AWA需要文采这我同意,但是PHD的thesis 需要的是综合的英语实力和词汇量,还有客观的分析。

哪里需要文采啊? 这种要求很严格的论文不能用比喻,类比,倒装.....
-- by 会员 FlyUFalcon (2010/11/7 18:47:41)


-- by 会员 majia20112011 (2010/11/8 2:44:11)




introduction is 5% of your final thesis. I agree that introduction needs interesting staff to dazzle the schemer.
But, over all, body graph in you thesis has to be objective, concise and entirely out of your personal WENCAI.
22#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-11 12:33:50 | 只看该作者
That might be true if you submit your paper to a journal. However, when you are on the market, each school get tons of applicants and would have no time to read the main body. Even for referees, most of the time introduction determines the fate of the paper.

90% of the people who read your paper will only read your abstract and at most introduction. If your introduction is not good enough , they would think the paper to be quite uninteresting and would ignore the rest.

文采?
真的吗?
你说gmat AWA需要文采这我同意,但是PHD的thesis 需要的是综合的英语实力和词汇量,还有客观的分析。

哪里需要文采啊? 这种要求很严格的论文不能用比喻,类比,倒装.....
-- by 会员 FlyUFalcon (2010/11/7 18:47:41)



-- by 会员 majia20112011 (2010/11/8 2:44:11)





introduction is 5% of your final thesis. I agree that introduction needs interesting staff to dazzle the schemer.
But, over all, body graph in you thesis has to be objective, concise and entirely out of your personal WENCAI.
-- by 会员 FlyUFalcon (2010/11/10 20:11:39)

23#
发表于 2010-11-24 23:30:50 | 只看该作者
好吧,其实我一直想说originality 是PHD最重要的....但是这东西多少靠灵感,没有originalit也没办法, 可以通过logical analysis 拟补。

LZ去读 张维迎的《契约》和张五常的《佃农》(都是两位的PHD论文)会觉得有文采吗?  刚开始必然是枯燥的, 但是随着文章的深入, 读者会被originality 和 logical analysis 所打动...
24#
发表于 2010-11-24 23:49:00 | 只看该作者
哎,张维迎的东西
25#
发表于 2011-6-27 01:05:24 | 只看该作者
GOOD POINT
\
26#
发表于 2011-6-27 11:56:04 | 只看该作者
我看国外教授发表的文章,好像都是白话文,用词也很简单,
一看就懂,可惜我们学不来。
27#
发表于 2011-7-16 01:47:15 | 只看该作者
idea第一 文采 和论证严密性 应该是并列的 前面几个说的好 有IDEA 有文采 有故事 数据跑一下 JFE JF照样发 运气好点AER都上了
28#
发表于 2011-7-23 22:42:38 | 只看该作者
英语是出国,并且活下去的最基本要求....
29#
发表于 2012-4-29 04:21:53 | 只看该作者
idea is king
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-24 11:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部