ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1930|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

07Prep one 逻辑!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-29 14:05:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
57.    (34655-!-item-!-188;#058&007580)

Roland:  The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon:  But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed.  So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high.
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate.
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites.
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports.
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.

答案A, 求翻译!求解释!
跪谢各位大侠了~!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-29 16:34:11 | 只看该作者
R:警告 然后说一个东西 主旨是 失业率高
S: 说了blabla一大堆 想表达的是 R说的那个东西是正常的 不能说明什么(注意S后面那个But,表面他和R的意见相左)
A R说的那个东西(就那个fact)不能说明失业率高 所以选A做为原文的结论
S说了一个东西反驳R
希望有帮助
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-29 19:50:17 | 只看该作者

谢谢

R:警告 然后说一个东西 主旨是 失业率高
S: 说了blabla一大堆 想表达的是 R说的那个东西是正常的 不能说明什么(注意S后面那个But,表面他和R的意见相左)
A R说的那个东西(就那个fact)不能说明失业率高 所以选A做为原文的结论
S说了一个东西反驳R
希望有帮助
-- by 会员 zhangyunkai5 (2010/10/29 16:34:11)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 03:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部