ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1548|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这个题干怎么理解?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-29 09:46:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Brochure:Help conserve our city’s water supply.By converting the landscaping (景观美化) in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.



Criticism:For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.



Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal(举反例;反驳;抗辩)of the criticism?

不明白题干的意思,是问下面哪个可以作为反对 “criticism”这个人的基础?还是问下面哪个是“criticism”这个人反对上面那个人的基础?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-29 10:03:16 | 只看该作者
B 主张改变庭院的景观设计,water-conserving landscape能节约水费,natural and attractive

C 反对改变,认为虽然节约了水费,但改造工程要花更多的钱。

反对C的话,就是支持B
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 17:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部