ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1425|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道GWD洛基题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-26 20:49:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?  
A.    Most people in Kirlandia who are currently earning the minimum wage have been employed at their current jobs for less than a year.
B.    Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00 per hour, in violation of Kirlandic employment regulations.
C.    Many businesses hire trainees at or near the minimum wage but must reward trained workers by keeping their pay levels above the pay level of trainees.
D.    The greatest growth in Kirlandia’s economy in recent years has been in those sectors where workers earn wages that tend to be much higher than the minimum wage.
E.    The current minimum wage is insufficient for a worker holding only one job to earn enough to support a family, even when working full time at that job.
答案C        我觉得B更说的同一些。。。。为什么啊!!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-26 21:13:53 | 只看该作者
B答案中的some 没有C中的many更削弱。  且以前这个州就规定最低为5元,说明some 这些公司以前就违法了(Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00 per hour,因为他们以前就给低于5元的工资),所以不能说明保证新的法律遏制他们不违法。
而c答案,实习生的价格提高了,自然正式员工的工资也要涨了。所以涨的更普遍了,所以会inflation,而且这里用了many 这个词。
板凳
发表于 2010-10-26 21:15:07 | 只看该作者
要说明的是对对大部分工资其实是有影响的--C说增加到5.5,那么很多公司其实都要增加,因为他们原本高出的很多,比如KD1,只剩KD0.5
B的话起不到weaken的作用啊,原本不达到的,提升到5.5还是不达到
这样说不知道对不对~~
地板
发表于 2010-10-26 21:33:47 | 只看该作者
C 通过 否定结论成立的条件 造成削弱。

条件中:当前只有少数人低于新工资线——》新政策不会造成太多变化

C选项: 实习生工资刚刚到工资线,正式员工keeping above实习生——》至

            少所有人一起增加了0.5(因为之前实习生刚达到5.0),所以新政策      造成了很多人变化
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 15:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部