ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Across
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]一道真题

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2004-5-4 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

mindfree的解释中可看出E的时态可能有问题,跟A一样If A is correct, that mean there are 5,000,000 species on the planet right now, and 1% can survive. That does not make sense. 如果现在完成时有这个意思,那确实错了。

22#
发表于 2004-5-4 11:29:00 | 只看该作者
反正我觉得E选项中的主语怪怪的,用99 percent !
23#
发表于 2004-5-4 12:24:00 | 只看该作者

I choose E too. Two reasons for further discussion:

1. ...of (the) five million ... that ...

I think that if "that" is used, there must be a "the" before the noun.

2. The tense.

"appeared" refers to a particular time in the past. "have appeared" refers to a period of time. Therefore, "have appeared" matched the meaning of the sentence better.

24#
发表于 2004-5-4 12:32:00 | 只看该作者
问了个美国鬼子,也说选E,告诉她答案是B,她说“也许B更简洁”?到底选什么哪?
25#
发表于 2004-5-4 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ca3ltoys在2004-5-4 1:51:00的发言:

个人感觉答案为A,因为只有A没有改变句子的中心,即Five hundred million different species of living creatures have appeared on Earth,(nearly 99 percent of them vanishing.独立主格结构)而其他的都强调99 percent..vanish,改变了句子的重心.请大牛帮忙解释一下句子重心及改变作者句子原意问题,谢谢.


Five hundred million different species of living creatures have appeared on Earth,nearly 99 percent of them vanishing.


偶坚持选A。理由同上。

挑战 Mindfree大牛说" If A is correct, that mean there are 5,000,000 species on the planet right now, and 1% can survive. That does not make sense. "

偶认为A的意思是说到目前为止有5,000,000 多种living creatures 出现在地球上,其中99%正在濒临灭绝。而非已经灭绝-此正是其他选项的逻辑问题!

当然A唯一让偶觉得不爽的地方就是them。但是比起逻辑问题,偶选A。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-4 12:49:59编辑过]
26#
发表于 2004-5-4 13:09:00 | 只看该作者

I cannot agree with A.

If A has the correct meaning, the tenses do not match. "have appeared" refers to a period of time. In this sentence it should refer to a long period of time from the inception of living creature on earth till now. It is not reasonable to say that all these five million creatures are still living, and 99% of them are vanishing.

27#
发表于 2004-5-4 13:40:00 | 只看该作者
LES MM,我觉得A从逻辑上也是不对的,主要后面用VANISHING,好像意思是这些存在过的生物都是现在在VANISH一样,而原意是已经VANISH了。
28#
发表于 2004-5-4 13:50:00 | 只看该作者

Quote an article to dispute A

"THE SIXTH GREAT EXTINCTION: A Status Report

Janet Larsen

Almost 440 million years ago, some 85 percent of marine animal species were wiped out in the earth's first known mass extinction. Roughly 367 million years ago, once again many species of fish and 70 percent of marine invertebrates perished in a major extinction event. Then about 245 million years ago, up to 95 percent of all animals—nearly the entire animal kingdom—were lost in what is thought to be the worst extinction in history.

Some 208 million years ago, another mass extinction took a toll primarily on sea creatures, but also some land animals. And 65 million years ago, three quarters of all species—including the dinosaurs—were eliminated.

Among the possible causes of these mass extinctions are volcanic eruptions, meteorites colliding with the earth, and a changing climate. After each extinction, it took upwards of 10 million years for biological richness to recover. Yet once a species is gone, it is gone forever.

The consensus among biologists is that we now are moving toward another mass extinction that could rival the past big five. This potential sixth great extinction is unique in that it is caused largely by the activities of a single species. It is the first mass extinction that humans will witness firsthand—and not just as innocent bystanders.

While scientists are not sure how many species inhabit the planet today, their estimates top 10 million. Yet each year thousands of species, ranging from the smallest microorganisms to larger mammals, are lost for good. Some disappear even before we know of their existence.

The average extinction rate is now some 1,000 to 10,000 times faster than the rate that prevailed over the past 60 million years. Throughout most of geological history, new species evolved faster than existing species disappeared, thus continuously increasing the planet's biological diversity. Now evolution is falling behind.

Only a small fraction of the world's plant species has been studied in detail, but as many as half are threatened with extinction. South and Central America, Central and West Africa, and Southeast Asia—all home to diverse tropical forests—are losing plants most rapidly.

Today nearly 5,500 animal species are known to be threatened with extinction. The IUCN—World Conservation Union's 2003 Red List survey of the world's flora and fauna shows that almost one in every four mammal species and one in eight bird species are threatened with extinction within the next several decades. (For access to IUCN's Red List of Threatened Species database, see www.redlist.org).

Of 1,130 threatened mammal species, 16 percent are critically endangered—the highest threat level. This means that 184 mammal species have suffered extreme and rapid reduction in population or habitat and may not survive this decade. Their remaining numbers range from under a few hundred to, at most, a few thousand individuals. For birds, 182 of the 1,194 threatened species are critically endangered.

Although the status of most of the world's mammals and birds is fairly well documented, we know relatively little about the rest of the world's fauna. Only 5 percent of fish, 6 percent of reptiles, and 7 percent of amphibians have been evaluated. Of those studied, at least 750 fish species, 290 reptiles, and 150 amphibians are at risk. Worrisome signs—like the mysterious disappearance of entire amphibian populations and fishers' nets that come up empty more frequently—reveal that there may be more species in trouble. Of invertebrates, including insects, mollusks, and crustaceans, we know the least. But what is known is far from reassuring.

At the advent of agriculture some 11,000 years ago, the world was home to 6 million people. Since then our ranks have grown a thousandfold. Yet the increase in our numbers has come at the expense of many other species.

The greatest threat to the world's living creatures is the degradation and destruction of habitat, affecting 9 out of 10 threatened species. Humans have transformed nearly half of the planet's ice-free land areas, with serious effects on the rest of nature. We have made agricultural fields out of prairies and forests. We have dammed rivers and drained wetlands. We have paved over soil to build cities and roads.

Each year the earth's forest cover shrinks by 16 million hectares (40 million acres), with most of the loss occurring in tropical forests, where levels of biodiversity are high. Ecologically rich wetlands have been cut in half over the past century. Other freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems have been degraded by pollution. Deserts have expanded to overtake previously vegetated areas, accelerated in some cases by overgrazing of domesticated animals.

A recent study of 173 species of mammals from around the world showed that their collective geographical ranges have been halved over the past several decades, signifying a loss of breeding and foraging area. Overall, between 2 and 10 percent of mammal populations (groups of a single species in a specific geographical location) are thought to have disappeared along with their habitat.

Direct human exploitation of organisms, such as through hunting and harvesting, threatens more than a third of the listed birds and mammals. Other threats to biodiversity include exotic species, often transported by humans, which can outcompete and displace native species.

A recent survey of some 1,100 animal and plant species found that climate change could wipe out between 15 and 37 percent of them by 2050. Yet the actual losses may be greater because of the complexity of natural systems. The extinction of key species could have cascading effects throughout the food web. As John Donne wrote, "no man is an island." The same is true for the other species we share this planet with: the loss of any single species from the web of life can affect many others.

Healthy ecosystems support us with many services—most fundamentally by supplying the air we breathe and filtering the water we drink. They provide us with food, medicine, and shelter. When ecosystems lose biological richness, they also lose resilience, becoming more susceptible to the effects of climate change, invasions of alien species, and other disturbances.

The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity provides a framework for countries to conserve biological diversity and promote sustainable development. It has been signed by 168 countries, notably excluding the United States. The parties, which recently held their seventh conference in February 2004 in Kuala Lumpur, have set a target of substantially reducing biodiversity loss by 2010. Yet the convention lacks mechanisms for action and enforcement, which may make it difficult to achieve the target.

Consciously avoiding habitat destruction and mitigating the effects of land use change, reducing the direct exploitation of plants and wildlife, and slowing climate change can help us stop weakening the very life-support systems we depend on. While this may be the first time in history that a single species can precipitate a mass extinction event, it is also the first time in history that a single species can act to prevent it.


Copyright © 2004 Earth Policy Institute"

--mindfree

29#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-4 14:03:00 | 只看该作者

嘻嘻,

大家这么热闹啊

偶补充一下个人意见. 偶选E. 没有看懂28楼mindfreeGG的论据. 太吓人了也

看看OG里面几个题目

24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.

(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during

(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in

(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over

(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply duringB

(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

In choice A, the simple past tense hardly increased does not match the present perfect have allowed; consequently, it seems that two different time periods are being discussed.

In B, the best choice, has hardly increased parallels have allowed to indicate that the events described took place at the same time.

Also in is the best word here for making a comparison between the beginning and the end of the twenty-year period.

Choices C and d are awkward and unidiomatic, and choice E fails to specify where there was no increase in per capita food supply. The question is a little more difficult than the average.

1. 从前很多对于A,B选项的争论. 现在有OG, 可以参考. 同时间发生的事情==>要同样的时态.

2. 生物appear, vanish都是漫长时间里面逐渐发生的. 应该是同样时间. 用两个完成时态比较好.

30#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-4 14:08:00 | 只看该作者

关于percent主语的问题

197. In the fall of 1985, only 10 percent of the women entering college planned to major in education, while 28 percent chose business, making it the most popular major for women as well as for men.

(A) as well as for men

(B) as well as the men

(C) and men too

(D) and men as well

(E)  and also men

Two elements connected by a coordinate conjunction should be expressed in parallel form. Only A, the best choice, cor­rectly observes this rule (the most popular major for women as well as for men). B, C, D, and E omit the necessary/or in the second element. In addition, by using the simple coordinate conjunction and, C, D, and E create the illogical impression that the decision of 28 percent of the women entering college in 1985 to choose business as a major also made the major the most popular among men. The conjunction as well as implies that business had already been the most popular major for men and that in 1985, for the first time, it became the most popular major for both sexes.

这个是OG的原句. 可以参考一下

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 23:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部