ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Several industries have recently switched at least partly from older technologies powered by fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. It is thus evident that less fossil fuel is being used as a result of the operations of these industries than would have been used if these industries had retained their older technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3384|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 67 ?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-12 19:43:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
67. Several industries have recently switched at least partly from older technologies powered by fossil fuels
to new technologies powered by electricity. It is thus evident that less fossil fuel is being used as a result of
the operations of these industries than would have been used if these industries had retained their older
technologies. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?
(A) Many of the industries that have switched at
least partly to the new technologies have
increased their output.
(B) Less fossil fuel was used to manufacture the
machinery employed in the new technologies
than was originally used to manufacture the
machinery employed in the older technologies.
(C) More electricity is used by those industries that
have switched at least partly to the new
technologies than by those industries that have
not switched.
(D) Some of the industries that have switched at
least partly to the new technologies still use
primarily technologies that are powered by
fossil fuels.
(E) The amount of fossil fuel used to generate
the electricity needed to power the new
technologies is less than the amount that would
have been used to power the older technologies.

答案是E,不懂B为什么不对?    还有OG上关于B的解释什么意思?   B貌似的确可以support的
B It does not matter how much fossil fuel was used to manufacture the older technologies originally.
Th at has no bearing on whether more fossil fuel would have been expended as a result of the
continued operation of the industries if the partial switch to newer technologies had not occurred.


似乎点睛之笔是“the result of the continued operation",  这又是啥意思?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-13 01:07:28 | 只看该作者
B探讨的是生产新旧机器需要多少fossil fuel, 与以后operations要用多少fossil fuel没有关系
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-13 16:33:27 | 只看该作者
楼上的筒子好像回答反了呀。。。
地板
发表于 2010-10-13 19:04:09 | 只看该作者
题目中提到的fossil fuels power 新旧technology的问题,而B中却说道了manufacture的问题,所以解释中才出现了it does not matter这样的话吧~~楼主觉得这样解释可以吗?这题我也有点朦~~~
5#
发表于 2010-10-14 00:02:35 | 只看该作者
文章问strengthen这个argument: less fossil fuel is being used as a result of the operations of these industries than would have been used if these industries had retained their older technologies
B说的是生产制造新旧机器的问题,而不是新旧机器在以后生产产品当中的消耗问题
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部