这脑子咋整的！

谢姒涵

疯了，做起逻辑来根本不是考试的思路，为什么会想得那么歪呢！
就拿这道题来说吧
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, a significant percentage of which are quite serious.  In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies.  However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.

Which of the following hypotheses receives the strongest support from the information given?

A.    The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo employees is lower than that among the general population.
B.    Zoo employees tend to develop animal-induced allergies that are more serious than those of other people who spend equally large amounts of time with animals.
C.    Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than is exposure to the kinds of animals that are kept in zoos.
D.    There is no occupation for which the risk of developing an animal-induced allergy is higher than 30 percent.
E.    Among members of the general population who have spent as much time with animals as zoo employees typically have, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is significantly more than 30 percent.
我选了D
因为看到题目中说zoo empolyer很快会从事其他职业，我就觉得其他职业不太容易得allergic ，D中说低于30%     所以empoyer 才要换职业，这样他们就不会得那病了。

看了答案以后，越发觉得自己的思维很奇怪，八竿子打不到一块儿呀！

痛苦！！ 再一礼拜就考了，我还在逻辑的深渊里，谁能拉我出去！！