OG10-CR-78 求助！！谢谢大家了

beryl8

. A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people
doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had
caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according
to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s
intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology
in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned
punishment in a similar experiment.
(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the
agents in the stories.



答案选A，OG给的解释是A indicates that younger children might be unable to tell whether the harm in the stories
was produced intentionally， 可是我实在没从A 看出来是怎么推出youngerchildren unable to tell whether...
大家帮忙解释一下可以吗？谢谢

夏日飘雪

A说要区分harm是故意的还是无意的需要listeners有相对成熟的对人类心理的感觉。。而孩童没有这种感觉，就分辨不出来，可能是由于年纪小的缘故吧
原文的结论是说孩童不认为人故意与否当做惩罚的标准