ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pesticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide, therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use is likely to become the norm.

which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the argument above?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5531|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD24-29

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-3 15:33:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds

to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although

these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is

likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pes-

ticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide,

therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use

is likely to become the norm.



which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the

argument above?

     A.Whether plant scientists have developed insect-resistant seeds

For every crop that is currently grown commercially
B.Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in larger

amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage.

C.Whether plants grown from the new genetically engineered seeds

can be kept completely free of insect damage.
D.Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant

crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do

currently used seeds.
E.Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have

Greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar vari-

eties in the past.

正确答案为D,我用排除法做的,留下了B和D,但选了B.觉得B 也很有道理,
回答是,那么可能新品种不用广泛使用。
      否,那么新品种就会广泛使用
请牛人们指点~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-6 13:12:12 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下~
板凳
发表于 2010-10-7 01:43:48 | 只看该作者
对于B你想错了
因为无论如何 基因工程的crop比普通的要更耐虫害,原文中已经表明它所需的杀虫剂少很多:farmers planting them can use far less pesticide。因此,不管是不是原来使用的杀虫剂相对于所应该使用的过量,基因工程的crop在杀虫剂方面的花费都比普通的少。因此就这点来说,基因工程的crop更有利。

而关于杀虫剂真正要考虑的是,是否目前所种普通的crop本身就所需要的杀虫剂就非常非常少,以至于使用抗虫害的crop并没有带来多少减少杀虫剂使用量方面的好处
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-8 13:26:18 | 只看该作者
明白了,谢谢~
我自己太马虎了。。
5#
发表于 2012-4-13 12:46:41 | 只看该作者
对于B你想错了
因为无论如何 基因工程的crop比普通的要更耐虫害,原文中已经表明它所需的杀虫剂少很多:farmers planting them can use far less pesticide。因此,不管是不是原来使用的杀虫剂相对于所应该使用的过量,基因工程的crop在杀虫剂方面的花费都比普通的少。因此就这点来说,基因工程的crop更有利。

而关于杀虫剂真正要考虑的是,是否目前所种普通的crop本身就所需要的杀虫剂就非常非常少,以至于使用抗虫害的crop并没有带来多少减少杀虫剂使用量方面的好处
-- by 会员 hjxsparrow (2010/10/7 1:43:48)

6#
发表于 2013-4-22 08:56:02 | 只看该作者
hjxsparrow 发表于 2010-10-7 01:43
对于B你想错了因为无论如何 基因工程的crop比普通的要更耐虫害,原文中已经表明它所需的杀虫剂少很多:farm ...

茅塞顿开!我开始也这样由于BD的!!
7#
发表于 2014-5-7 20:27:05 | 只看该作者
E是无关选项吗?我选的E
8#
发表于 2021-2-3 23:55:16 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 09:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部