ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2292|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教nn一道cr

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-2 23:23:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Itis illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly tophysicians, either by mail or in medical journals.  A proposed law would allow generaladvertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specializedknowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians forinappropriate medications.  But sincephysicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for apatient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.

Whichof the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

(A)Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to theexistence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previouslythought to be untreatable
(B)Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask fora particular medication they have seen advertised
(C)Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisementsdirected to the general public to provide the same information as doadvertisements directed to physicians
(D) Whetheradvertisements for prescription medications are currently an important sourceofinformation about newly available medications for physicians
(E) Whether physicians would give in toa patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when theone originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired
选E
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-5 01:19:27 | 只看该作者
题目是说,现在新的法律将不再禁止广告药品,但是可能的后果是,缺少医学常识的民众会向医生买不适合自己服用的药品。但是,毕竟是否给病人开药的决定权在医生手里,因此,可以避免对于这种后果的担心。
E选项说,重点在于,当医生自己开的药没有起到好效果的时候,医生会不会向病人屈服,即使病人要求的药不合适,医生也会开给他。因此决定权可能不在医生手上了。
所以重点在于E
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-23 06:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部