ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rebecca_wang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

讨论雨法狗第13题~GWD答案错误?!纠结中。。。。

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-9-24 10:19:07 | 只看该作者
我刚刚又去溜了一圈    如果真的运气不好明天碰到了  我还是选C吧   总觉得选D说服不了自己。。。
12#
发表于 2010-9-24 11:11:44 | 只看该作者
我也觉得选C
13#
发表于 2010-9-24 12:23:11 | 只看该作者
觉得是D

但不要相信我.....我今天一战考砸了
14#
发表于 2010-9-24 15:51:57 | 只看该作者
我刚刚又去溜了一圈    如果真的运气不好明天碰到了  我还是选C吧   总觉得选D说服不了自己。。。
-- by 会员 mini1201 (2010/9/24 10:19:07)


我也觉得。。。找了半天没找到能不能说will be likely to do,虽然觉得这样说很累赘。。。
但是表目的用for doing的时候只在名词后面见过,有动作都是用to do来表示的
15#
发表于 2010-9-24 17:22:24 | 只看该作者
找到一个句子,og里的
105. Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

选a

那就可以解释d了
16#
发表于 2010-9-24 17:22:37 | 只看该作者
反对C的都是说C中的will be to 有问题,个人认为有跟风之嫌;事实上,这是个倒装,还原成正常语序就是will be likely to do,一点儿问题也没有

反而,D中的for doing表示目的在OG中,还有在beatgmat等网站中,大部分都说是is not idiomatic

我问过以为学英文教育学的朋友,native speaker,她也说英文写作中,用will be to的情况是很普遍的,很常用的
17#
发表于 2010-9-24 17:26:39 | 只看该作者
找到一个句子,og里的
105. Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

选a

那就可以解释d了
-- by 会员 carey513 (2010/9/24 17:22:24)


OG12-105涉及的考点可以归纳如下:
1.  语序——比较选项
复杂句会出现的考点,主语和谓语之间最多一个修饰成分,如果多余一个修饰成分,句子会变得冗长不清楚【之前还有一题】
2.   分词——比较选项
一定要判定修饰的逻辑主语是谁,是否合符逻辑意思
夹在中间的v-ing短语可修饰前也可修饰后;which从句就只能往前指代,所以就近指代前面的名词时最好使用定语从句。
不明白ls这位tx为什么说这个题可以说明选d
18#
发表于 2010-9-24 18:19:50 | 只看该作者
额   这个。。。  我又去溜达了一圈    然后我觉得  可能  maybe   应该是D

Manhattan给出C的错误并不是will be to是否idiom   是因为rate the likelihood 比rate how likely更formal

CAREY513同学找的例子也说明了developed sth for doing是可行的  

求讨论啊求讨论。。。
19#
发表于 2010-9-24 18:57:13 | 只看该作者
og说明develop for doing是可以的啊,那么1楼的那题D就不存在困惑了
20#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-25 00:13:59 | 只看该作者
讨论了半天也没结果,谁都说服不了谁,可恶的GMAC~!盼求大牛出现将此题结案~!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-22 23:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部