这道语法不太懂

Silan

Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 ayear toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

（contribute….toward/to固定搭配）

A.year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year

B.year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year

C.year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education

D.year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously

E.year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

正确答案是D   请教NN    C错在哪里啊？   谢谢~~~

janeee

我认为compared to是比较不相同的两类实物，意思有“把...比作...”的意思;还有preciously错误修饰$7

但是我有个关于B的疑问，B虽然读起来比较拗口，但是我没有找到绝对性的错误，如果实战，很难瞬间排除！
OPEN TO DISCUSSION

elaineyll

我认为compared to是比较不相同的两类实物，意思有“把...比作...”的意思;还有preciously错误修饰$7

但是我有个关于B的疑问，B虽然读起来比较拗口，但是我没有找到绝对性的错误，如果实战，很难瞬间排除！
OPEN TO DISCUSSION

-- by 会员 janeee (2010/9/23 10:56:31)

for which was previously paid $7 per year  —— 主语是什么呢？

ivymm0301

compared to的逻辑主语是students，显然不对吧

janeee

按一般理解来说，介词+which从句，倒装，理论上which是可以做主语的，所以它没有错，只是实际上很少出现这种情况；
我GOOGLE了一下，有人讲这种情况下“因为 for which was previously paid $7 per year 里面 was previously paid 的主语不能在后面，必须在前面。”——不知道这个解释有什么依据？

531769079

我认为compared to是比较不相同的两类实物，意思有“把...比作...”的意思;还有preciously错误修饰$7

但是我有个关于B的疑问，B虽然读起来比较拗口，但是我没有找到绝对性的错误，如果实战，很难瞬间排除！
OPEN TO DISCUSSION

-- by 会员 janeee (2010/9/23 10:56:31)

for which 有点wordy吧

janeee

我认为compared to是比较不相同的两类实物，意思有“把...比作...”的意思;还有preciously错误修饰$7

但是我有个关于B的疑问，B虽然读起来比较拗口，但是我没有找到绝对性的错误，如果实战，很难瞬间排除！
OPEN TO DISCUSSION

-- by 会员 janeee (2010/9/23 10:56:31)

for which 有点wordy吧

-- by 会员 531769079 (2010/9/23 11:41:11)

不能这样判断，我总结了OG12，里面很多题目都表现出“介词+which”是优选项

wakjzmb

previously 是副词吧？

zhanhualv

compared to的逻辑主语是students，显然不对吧

-- by 会员 ivymm0301 (2010/9/23 11:40:26)

正解，ed的逻辑对照

Silan

compared to的逻辑主语是students，显然不对吧

-- by 会员 ivymm0301 (2010/9/23 11:40:26)

 这种分析的不太明白~~~~晕了！