ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in Country X since its new government came to power. Neighboring Country Y has experienced the same climatic conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in Country X, it has been rising in Country Y.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5552|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

周末考试!~关于削弱题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-22 23:01:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
削弱题如果结论是:
therefore……,since……
那么削弱应该是削therefore后面的,还是since后面的??
一直疑惑中。。
不好意思,手边没有题能贴上来。。
谢谢大家指教啊!!!

找到了一道题。大家看看~
Prep 49.(34269-!-item-!-188;#058&007557)OG上也有)



An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in Country X since its new government came to power.Neighboring Country Y has experienced the same climatic conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in Country X, it has been rising in Country Y.



Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?



(A) Industrial production also is declining in Country X.

(B) Whereas Country Y is landlocked, Country X has a major seaport.

(C) Both Country X and Country Y have been experiencing drought conditions.

(D) The crops that have always been grown in Country X are different from those that have always been grown in Country Y.

(E) Country X's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods.



这道题削弱,削弱的是那句话呀?我怎么看着是削弱的第一句话:An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in Country X since its new government came to power.那所说的削弱结论——结论指的的是什么?是conclusiong总结句(这里的第一句),还是最后一句(这里给出的理由)?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-23 00:10:30 | 只看该作者
therefore 后面是 结论,since 后面是原因
削弱是削弱 结果,即 这种因果的逻辑关系
不是单纯的削弱哪一个部分

找到了题目来发下……
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-23 15:35:42 | 只看该作者
therefore 后面是 结论,since 后面是原因
削弱是削弱 结果,即 这种因果的逻辑关系
不是单纯的削弱哪一个部分

找到了题目来发下……
-- by 会员 aomeisoft7 (2010/9/23 0:10:30)


找到了一道~贴出来了
地板
发表于 2010-9-23 16:07:09 | 只看该作者
这道题削弱,削弱的是那句话呀?我怎么看着是削弱的第一句话:An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in Country X since its new government came to power.那所说的削弱”结论”——结论指的的是什么?是conclusiong总结句(这里的第一句),还是最后一句(这里给出的理由)?

削弱的是结论,第一句话就是结论。
since + 理由。这个例子本身是没有错误的,错在不能当做理由,即 这个例子证明不了 结论




An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in Country X since its new government came to power.Neighboring Country Y has experienced the same climatic conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in Country X, it has been rising in Country Y.
农作物低产的原因,是过度集中的经济,而不是气候改变(这句话是结论)。因为 邻国Y 有一样的气候条件,但农作物产量上升(这句话是理由)

它的逻辑是:
拿Y国与X国对比,控制了一个不变量(气候),所以, 经济是 X减产的原因
这里很明显忽略了很多其他的可能造成 减产的原因
所以要削弱, 要找到其他的原因。

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
求削弱



(A) Industrial production also is declining in Country X.
X国工业也减产。无关

(B) Whereas Country Y is landlocked, Country X has a major seaport.
Y国在内陆。X国在港口。个人觉得也有削弱,但是没有D直接,

(C) Both Country X and Country Y have been experiencing drought conditions.
X和Y气候条件一样。支持

(D) The crops that have always been grown in Country X are different from those that have always been grown in Country Y.
X和Y的农作物不一样。所以“X,Y气候相同”不能作为论据,因为不同作物要求的气候不同。直接削弱题目的因果逻辑

(E) Country X's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods.
X的centralized economy.无关
5#
发表于 2010-9-23 16:08:21 | 只看该作者
顺便问个问题哈哈,那个 小爱心怎么打出来的呀
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-23 18:21:43 | 只看该作者
顺便问个问题哈哈,那个 小爱心怎么打出来的呀
-- by 会员 aomeisoft7 (2010/9/23 16:08:21)


thx~
“标题”底下有个小方块,你把鼠标搁上面就可以选了~
7#
发表于 2013-6-20 00:47:18 | 只看该作者
aomeisoft7 发表于 2010-9-23 16:07
这道题削弱,削弱的是那句话呀?我怎么看着是削弱的第一句话:An overly centralized economy, not the cha ...

这道题说的是要削弱第一句话也就是 要消弱“economy是导致agricultural production减少的原因.
B说了两国的区别是economy不同, 其实是strengthen了而不是weaken。
D说的是两国农作物不一样,说赢有可能是农作物导致的粮食产量不同, weaken了第一句话。
og解释也是这样说的。而不是四楼所说的B选项没有D直接。
但是这道题如何判断argument真的很模糊。。。。。
其实读一读觉得第二句其实是第一句argument的一个evidence。 两国气候都一样。 但是粮食产量不同。 肯定是有别的原因导致粮食产量不同。 而且他问的是消弱argument。 第二句显然不能当argument充其量是个evidence
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 09:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部