ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4132|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 104题 百思不得其解~!求高人相助!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-19 23:39:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a Spendless discount separtment store that just opened,those locations will not stay vacant for long.In the five years since the openning of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new stpre has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.

which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the Spendless store opened.
B. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since colson's opened have been discount stores.
C. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
D. Over the courese of the next five years,it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
E. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either Spendless or Colson's.


完全不明白S C  和其他store之间的关系~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-20 07:05:47 | 只看该作者
就是说不是由于colson,s才倒闭的,是由于其他商店的数量的增加
板凳
发表于 2010-9-20 08:24:51 | 只看该作者
我觉得这道题OG的解释还是很清楚的。  类比无效。

文章说折扣店G因为竞争不过折扣店S所以要倒闭,但是很快会有其他的折扣店来顶替。这个预测的依据是,五年前,许多竞争不过非折扣店C的店面,很快被顶替。

这里,文章假设非折扣店被顶替和折扣店被顶替是一样的。如何削弱,就是证明类比无效。

如果顶替非折扣店的是折扣店,那么就说明非折扣不再有存在的必要。那么同理,顶替折扣店G的就未必还是折扣店了,因为,折扣店也很可能没有存在的必要。

Since the reasoning relies on a presumed similarity ………那段解释再认真读读。
地板
发表于 2017-2-6 17:04:35 | 只看该作者
winny莹 发表于 2010-9-20 08:24
我觉得这道题OG的解释还是很清楚的。  类比无效。文章说折扣店G因为竞争不过折扣店S所以要倒闭,但是 ...

Mark一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 04:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部