ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragments' size, astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. These analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments' entry. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2246|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP 1-15.

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-16 21:55:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragments' size, astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere.These analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments' entry. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.





In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?




In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?




In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?





(A) The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation.




(A) The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation.




(A) The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation.





(B) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.





(C) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.





(D) The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that conclusion.





(E) The first is a judgment advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion


为什么prep答案E上的前一句是a judgment advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument呢?不是在说“这些分析透露了一个空前绝后的traces of sulfur当碎片进入之后。”么?这不明明是一个circumstance么?求解!
为什么prep答案E上的前一句是a judgment advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument呢?不是在说“这些分析透露了一个空前绝后的traces of sulfur当碎片进入之后。”么?这不明明是一个circumstance么?求解!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-17 08:12:33 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-252976-1-1.html
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 06:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部