- UID
- 316693
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-2-17
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing. A.There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing. B.There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished. C.There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing. D.Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished. E.Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
其实there are句型,就是主语在最后。there are XX=XX are there。根据这个,DE可以直接排除,因为cod and haddock、catching cod and haddock与no legal limits直接类比了。另外,unlike不能用在句中,因为会造成歧义,如果不能理解可以直接记住这个原则,排除B。C的错误很多,比如which的指代。如果看如何判断but not for monkfish,这种省略一定要还原,legal limits are not for monkfish,for与limitation 不搭配,读起来也很奇怪。因此就是A。 |
|